Dual degree or research experience?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the decision between pursuing a dual degree in physics and engineering versus gaining research experience as an undergraduate, particularly in the context of preparing for PhD applications. Participants explore the implications of each path on graduate school admissions and the importance of research experience in the application process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about completing a dual degree in physics and engineering while lacking research experience, questioning how this would affect PhD applications compared to applicants with more research but only one degree.
  • Another participant shares their experience of managing to complete two minors alongside a primary degree while still engaging in multiple research opportunities, suggesting that research experience is prioritized by graduate admissions committees over dual degrees.
  • A third participant emphasizes the critical nature of research experience for graduate school applications, citing advice from professors that it is almost essential for applicants.
  • Several participants inquire about what constitutes research experience, discussing various forms such as research units, self-directed study, honors thesis units, and summer research programs.
  • One participant seeks advice on starting research early while attending community college, questioning whether working as a lab assistant in a pharmaceutical development business would count as research experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of research experience for PhD applications, but there is no consensus on the value of dual degrees versus research experience. Multiple competing views exist regarding what qualifies as research experience.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the definition of research experience can vary, with distinctions made between different types of research activities and their perceived value by graduate admissions committees.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering graduate school in STEM fields, particularly those weighing the benefits of dual degrees against the necessity of research experience.

mbisCool
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
With supplemental summer coursework, I can finish a degree in physics and engineering in four years. If i decide to finish with this route, I will surely have little to no research experience as an undergrad. My academic goal is a phd. I know how important research experience is for phd applications, but I love physics and engineering and really want to complete the two degrees.

Does anyone have any idea how an applicant with a degree in physics/engineering and little to no research experience would hold up againsts other applicants with a lot of experience but one degree? Would it be detrimental to my applications to go this route? Has anyone else taken a similar route? Did anyone manage to find time to do research even with their entire adademic schedule dedicated to courses?

As always, any input from the community would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got two minors (math and chem) with my primary degree (physics) and still did research (one summer in my undergrad chemistry department, one summer REU, and two years in my undergrad physics department. I arranged my schedule to have some free afternoons, and I also did some research work on weekends (once I was trained enough to be considered responsible with the equipment).

I also think, based on my experience as a graduate admissions committee member, that committees will rate research experience over a dual major and no research.

Two majors will say you can do coursework just fine, but it says nothing about the primary reason to be in graduate school and attain a Ph.D... which is to do research.
 
I'm going through the graduate school application process right now. By what I have heard from professors and former undergrads turned grads is that research experience is VERY important. Here is a quote from a physics professor of mine:

Grad schools expect undergrads to have research experience when applying. It's almost essential to your application.

I suggest to focus on getting research experience, especially if you are serious about going into a PhD program.

As physics girl phd said, research is what you are going to do in grad school. It's what you'll be paid to do as a PhD candidate and after you graduate. Looking at things this way, two degrees will not make up for having no research experience.
 
Thanks for the replies.
 
What counts as research?

Research units? Self-directed study units? Honours thesis units? Design units (engineering)? Summer semester research?
 
PhysicalAnomaly said:
What counts as research?

Research units? Self-directed study units? Honours thesis units? Design units (engineering)? Summer semester research?

Typically research would consist of "cutting edge" work with a research group (faculty-led or at a national lab, etc.) that could lead to publishable results. When graduate school look at research experience, it's a big plus if you've been on a publication (or a few!). Of your list above, I'd say research units or thesis units (which are generally schedule filler to keep an upper-level student full time during the term(s) when research is conducted) and summer semester research, generally in a program like REU, although it can also be done at your own university.

What the graduate admissions committees really look for is: publications, conference presentations (national meetings would be better than regional), for your personal statement to describe your role in your research experiences, and for your letters of recommendations to back up your personal statement by stating your drive and hopefully critical roles in your research experiences.

While some students write about self-directed study or projects in design courses (and have faculty recommendations to back those up, those experiences aren't as critical... and are rather second tier. Worth mentioning if you have no first tier experiences... but still not as good.
 
I would like to get started on research early; however, I am currently at a community college so I have no opportunities within the school. Would it be wise to put this off until my junior year after I transfer? Do you have any advice on where to find research opportunities outside of school? There is a pharmaceutical development business near my house, would working as something such as a lab assistant be considered research experience? Even if I wouldn't be doing the research myself?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K