Dual Slit Experiment: Detecting Photons/Particles?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jimcave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Experiment Slit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of placing a detector at the emitter in the Dual Slit Experiment, specifically regarding photon and particle behavior. Participants confirm that detecting which slit a photon or particle passes through eliminates the wave-like interference pattern. RandallB emphasizes that positioning a detector at the emitter effectively transforms it into the source, maintaining the same experimental outcomes. Moving the detector closer to one of the slits results in the loss of the interference pattern due to the lack of illumination at the other slit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Dual Slit Experiment
  • Knowledge of wave-particle duality
  • Basic concepts of photon detection methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum measurement on wave function collapse
  • Explore advanced photon detection techniques in quantum optics
  • Study the concept of quantum erasure and its effects on interference patterns
  • Investigate variations of the Dual Slit Experiment with different configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundational principles of wave-particle duality and experimental quantum physics.

jimcave
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello - I wonder has anyone tried to place a detector for (photons/particles) just as they leave the emitter. If so does the wave like behaviour disappear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the emitter or source does not make a diff.
But there are many ways to detect "which way" or which slit and all remove the wave like interferance. Do a search here on "double slit" or "Erasure".
 
Yes, RandallB is right, because a detector at the emitter really just turns that into the source. If you still have the same experiment with the source at that point, then you'll still get the same experimental result. If you move the detector closer to one of the slits, then you are in effect doing the experiment with the source at that point, and when you fail to illuminate the other slit with that source, then you will lose your interference pattern.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
456
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K