Dumb question on U-238 neutron capture

Wikipedia said U-238 is better with capturing fast neutrons than slow neutrons. shouldn't it be the other way round? I thought U-238 is not fissile but is fissionble by neutrons with high enough K.E, and doens't fast neutrons have higher K.E.??
 

malawi_glenn

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
U-238 is even-even and can't be fissioned by thermal (slow) neutrons, so it requires fast neutrons to be fissioned. The activation energy is 6.6MeV.

Where is the contradiction? You say that wiki claims that U-238 is better to capture fast neutrons than slow. You says that U-238 require neutrons with high enough K.E.

Where is your confusion?
 
Thank you for the reply,

wiki said fast neutrons required for U-238 to capture and become U-239, which then decays into Pu-239.

my confusion is: Won't fast neutrons more likely to cause fission than transform 238 to 239?
 

malawi_glenn

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
It depends on K.E

There is no contradiction since you are talking about two different things.

What you really need is a diagram over cross section for the two processes: "Pu-239 formation" and "fission" as a function of neutron energy.
 

Related Threads for: Dumb question on U-238 neutron capture

  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
638
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
699
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
12K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top