U-238 Neutron Capture: Clarifying Misconceptions about Fast and Slow Neutrons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the neutron capture properties of Uranium-238 (U-238), specifically addressing misconceptions regarding its interaction with fast and slow neutrons. Participants explore the conditions under which U-238 can capture neutrons to form Uranium-239 (U-239) and the implications for fission processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the claim that U-238 is better at capturing fast neutrons than slow neutrons, suggesting that fast neutrons, having higher kinetic energy, should be less likely to lead to capture and more likely to cause fission.
  • Another participant clarifies that U-238 cannot be fissioned by thermal (slow) neutrons and requires fast neutrons for fission, citing an activation energy of 6.6 MeV.
  • A later reply notes that fast neutrons are necessary for U-238 to capture and transform into U-239, which subsequently decays into Plutonium-239 (Pu-239), raising a question about the likelihood of fission versus transformation.
  • One participant emphasizes that the confusion arises from discussing two different processes and suggests that a diagram showing the cross sections for Pu-239 formation and fission as a function of neutron energy would clarify the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between neutron energy and the processes of fission and capture in U-238. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of fast versus slow neutron interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the interpretation of U-238's neutron capture characteristics, and the discussion highlights the complexity of neutron interactions without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions involved.

morage_key_ri
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia said U-238 is better with capturing fast neutrons than slow neutrons. shouldn't it be the other way round? I thought U-238 is not fissile but is fissionble by neutrons with high enough K.E, and doens't fast neutrons have higher K.E.??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U-238 is even-even and can't be fissioned by thermal (slow) neutrons, so it requires fast neutrons to be fissioned. The activation energy is 6.6MeV.

Where is the contradiction? You say that wiki claims that U-238 is better to capture fast neutrons than slow. You says that U-238 require neutrons with high enough K.E.

Where is your confusion?
 
Thank you for the reply,

wiki said fast neutrons required for U-238 to capture and become U-239, which then decays into Pu-239.

my confusion is: Won't fast neutrons more likely to cause fission than transform 238 to 239?
 
It depends on K.E

There is no contradiction since you are talking about two different things.

What you really need is a diagram over cross section for the two processes: "Pu-239 formation" and "fission" as a function of neutron energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K