Dynamics in Motion: Solving Problems with Acceleration and Velocity Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter aatari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the motion of a hockey puck that accelerates from rest, moves at a constant speed, and then decelerates. The context includes understanding the application of kinematic equations in different segments of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of various kinematic equations to determine the speed of the puck at different stages of its motion. There is confusion regarding which equations are appropriate for the different segments of motion, particularly concerning the relevance of time in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the application of specific equations and the relevance of time in the context of the problem. Some have provided insights into the different phases of motion, suggesting a need for careful analysis of each segment.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition that the problem involves multiple segments of motion: acceleration, constant speed, and deceleration. Participants are grappling with the implications of these segments on the choice of equations to use.

aatari
Messages
73
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Problem: [/B]During a pond hockey game, a puck accelerates from rest at 5.0 m/s 2over a distance of 80.0 cm. The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s until it reaches a rough section which causes it to stop in 2.5 s.

a. What is the speed of the object when it reaches the rough section?

Homework Equations


[/B]
a = (v2v1) / Δt..... (1)
Δd = v1Δt + ½aΔt2 ...(2)
Δd = (v22 v12) / 2a... (3)
v
2 = v1 + aΔt...... (4)
v22 = v12 + 2aΔd... (5)

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi guys, I know how to solve this question but I am having trouble understanding when to use which equation. And I am hoping one you can help me understand when to use what equation.

So for the question above we are asked to find the speed of the puck, which is very easy. The way I understand, we can solve this by either using equation (4) or equation (5). Both these equations will give us the final velocity. However, if I use equation 4 my answer is 20 m/s and if I use equation 5, I get 2.8 m/s. This is a significant difference and I don't understand why this is.

How do I figure out when to use what equation in situation like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aatari said:
The way I understand, we can solve this by either using equation (4) or equation (5).
How can you use equation (4)? You don't have the time.
 
Doc Al said:
How can you use equation (4)? You don't have the time.
The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s. Isn't time 4.0 s before the puck reaches the rough section?
 
aatari said:
The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s. Isn't time 4.0 s before the puck reaches the rough section?
That time is irrelevant for figuring out the speed.

Realize that there are two (really three!) segments to the motion, each quite different: (a) Constant acceleration as it moves from speed zero to some unknown speed; (b) Constant speed for 4 s until it hits the rough spot; (c) Constant acceleration as it slows down to rest.

To find that cruising speed, you must analyze segment (a). Equation (4) won't help you there.
 
Doc Al said:
That time is irrelevant for figuring out the speed.

Realize that there are two (really three!) segments to the motion, each quite different: (a) Constant acceleration as it moves from speed zero to some unknown speed; (b) Constant speed for 4 s until it hits the rough spot; (c) Constant acceleration as it slows down to rest.

To find that cruising speed, you must analyze segment (a). Equation (4) won't help you there.

Why and how is it irrelevant though? How can someone who is new to this topic in physics can figure this out?
 
aatari said:
Why and how is it irrelevant though?
The given 4.0 seconds is the time the puck was moving at constant speed. It's not the time it took to accelerate from zero to that speed (which is what equation 4 would require).

aatari said:
How can someone who is new to this topic in physics can figure this out?
You need to learn to recognize different types of motion: constant acceleration versus constant velocity, for one. The secret? Solve as many problems as you can! (That's how you get good.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aatari

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K