Dynamics/Mechanics problem

  • Thread starter paul_harris77
  • Start date
In summary: Thanks for the reply. So, presumably, I need to work out the angular acceleration (alpha) for w(0) and w(t). Do I do this by using the vector sum of the accelerations, substituting in w(0) and w(t) and rearranging for alpha?:11.33^2=((w^2r)^2)+((alpha*r)^2)If I do this for w(0) I get alpha= 0.1133 rads^-2. This means that the tangential acceleration is aθ = r*alpha.
  • #1
paul_harris77
52
0
I am attempting to solve the dynamics question below:

"A car of mass 600kg is driven in a circle of constant radius (100m). It is known that the car becomes unstable under a side force of 6800N. Determine the minimum time allowable for the car to accelerate uniformly from 80 to 100km/h."

m= 600kg, r =100m and F=6800N.

I am assuming that the overall aim is to obtain the tangential acceleration (aθ) i.e. the acceleration in the car's direction of travel, and from that work out the time using the change in velocity of 20km/h.

I have worked out the "resultant" acceleration on the side of the car, using a=F/m = 6800/600 = 11.33ms^-2.

The trouble I am having is splitting this overall "resultant" acceleration into tangential (aθ)
and radial (ar) components.

I know the equation for resultant acceleration is derived from simple pythagoras:

a = sqrt((aθ^2)+(ar^2))

I also have the following equations:

ar = wr^2 (where w is omega and ar is radial acceleration)
aθ = r*alpha (where alpha is angular acceleration)
vθ=wr

Since, w and vθ are changing, I have started by trying to work out the acceleration components in terms of changes in vθ and w over time.

The answer should be 4.9 seconds, but I am stuck with how to get this answer.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks

Paul
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ar = wr^2 (where w is omega and ar is radial acceleration)
aθ = r*alpha (where alpha is angular acceleration)
vθ=wr

Those are the equations I would start with, and use them to calculate the forces in the radial and tangential directions. Add those up vectorially to find the magnitude of the total force. Presumably the tangential acceleration will have to be limited to some value to keep the total force from exceeding the value given.
 
  • #3
Thanks for reply. I believe that what the question means by side force is the overall resultant force acting on the side of the car from the radial and tangential forces combined. Hence the the magnitude of the total "resultant" force on the car is the side force of 6800N. So this force and hence the acceleration of 11.33ms^-2 needs to be split up into tangential and radial components.

I can work out aθ in terms of the minimum time, t, but I cannot do the same for the radial acceleration. Radial acceleration is equal to wr^2, but since w is accelerating, I cannot use this and cannot get it into terms of t.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Paul
 
  • #4
paul_harris77 said:
Thanks for reply. I believe that what the question means by side force is the overall resultant force acting on the side of the car from the radial and tangential forces combined. Hence the the magnitude of the total "resultant" force on the car is the side force of 6800N. So this force and hence the acceleration of 11.33ms^-2 needs to be split up into tangential and radial components.

I can work out aθ in terms of the minimum time, t, but I cannot do the same for the radial acceleration. Radial acceleration is equal to wr^2, but since w is accelerating, I cannot use this and cannot get it into terms of t.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Paul

I'm not seeing the difficulty. You have an w(t) which starts out at some w(0) and increases according to the acceleration. At any instant, the radial force is just mw^2/R, as you have stated. The force to accelerate the car in the tangential direction is F=ma, which you can relate to the angular acceleration as you have indicated...
 
  • #5
Sorry but I still do not understand. Since the resultant force ( side force of 6800N) is constant and the tangential force is constant (uniform acceleration), surely the radial force has to be constant? But it isn't since w is increasing.
 
  • #6
paul_harris77 said:
Sorry but I still do not understand. Since the resultant force ( side force of 6800N) is constant and the tangential force is constant (uniform acceleration), surely the radial force has to be constant? But it isn't since w is increasing.

The tangential force cannot be constant. In order to optimize the acceleration (minimize the time to the higher speed, as asked in the OP), you will have to reduce the tangential acceleration as the angular speed increrases. You can accelerate harder in the beginning, but less so near the end, or you will exceed the max total vector acceleration magnitude.
 
  • #7
Thanks for the reply. So, presumably, I need to work out the angular acceleration (alpha) for w(0) and w(t). Do I do this by using the vector sum of the accelerations, substituting in w(0) and w(t) and rearranging for alpha?:

11.33^2=((w^2r)^2)+((alpha*r)^2)

If I do this for w(0) I get alpha= 0.1133 rads^-2. This means that the tangential acceleration is aθ = r*alpha.

This gives me a value of 11.33ms-2 which surely can't be right since the overall resultant acceleration was found to be 11.33ms-2?!

If I do the same for w(t), I get aθ = 2.23ms-2 which seems to concur with your explanation of decreasing tangential acceleration.

If so, how am I to calculate the minimum time if the acceleration in the tangential direction is constantly changing?


Another thing I am confused about, is the fact that the OP said uniform acceleration. I thought that this means uniform acceleration in the tangential direction. Surely if you were in a car and put your foot down on the gas, and left it in one position, you would accelerate uniformly in the tangential direction. Does this mean, that in order to keep the side force below 6800N, you would need to ease off on the gas as your angular velocity increases?
 
  • #8
I don't see where the OP problem statement says uniform acceleration... It says constant radius, and asks for the minimum possible time to accelerate, but that's about it (unless I'm missing something).

As for the calculation, I'm guessing it will be an integral equation, since the accelerations are not constant.


EDIT -- And yes, you would be lifting a bit on the accelerator as you got going faster around the circle...
 
  • #9
Determine the minimum time allowable for the car to accelerate uniformly from 80 to 100km/h.

I am assuming that it means uniform tangential acceleration, since that it the direction of the velocity increase. Surely this means that the side force cannot be constant at 6800N, rather it is an upper bound, since radial acceleration HAS to increase?
 
  • #10
paul_harris77 said:
I am assuming that it means uniform tangential acceleration, since that it the direction of the velocity increase. Surely this means that the side force cannot be constant at 6800N, rather it is an upper bound, since radial acceleration HAS to increase?

I'm interpreting it as the magnitude of the total acceleration, which is the vector sum of the radial and tangential accelerations. You have the radial acceleration vector pointing in toward the center of the circle, and the tangential acceleration vector pointing in the direction that the car is moving (tangent to the circular motion). The vector sum is going to point mostly toward the center of the circle, but a bit forward of that with respect to the car. The magnitude of that vector sum is constrained by the max acceleration specified. So as the car moves faster and the radial component increases, the tangential component must decrease in order to keep the magnitude of the vector sum at that maxumum limit.
 

What is the difference between dynamics and mechanics?

Dynamics and mechanics are closely related fields of study in physics. Dynamics focuses on the motion of objects and the forces that cause them, while mechanics is a broader term that encompasses the study of motion, forces, energy, and the properties of matter. Essentially, mechanics is a more general term that includes dynamics as a subset.

What is Newton's Second Law of Motion?

Newton's Second Law of Motion states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting upon it and inversely proportional to its mass. This can be represented by the equation F=ma, where F is the net force, m is the mass of the object, and a is the resulting acceleration.

How is kinetic energy related to mechanics?

Kinetic energy is a type of energy that an object possesses due to its motion. In mechanics, kinetic energy is an important concept as it relates to the work-energy theorem, which states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. This is a fundamental principle in understanding the behavior of objects in motion.

What is the difference between statics and dynamics?

Statics and dynamics are two branches of mechanics that deal with the study of objects at rest and in motion, respectively. In statics, the focus is on objects that are in equilibrium, meaning the forces acting on them are balanced. In dynamics, the focus is on objects that are accelerating due to unbalanced forces acting on them.

How can I apply dynamics/mechanics principles in real-life situations?

Dynamics and mechanics principles are used in many real-life situations, such as designing structures, analyzing the movement of vehicles, and understanding the behavior of objects in sports. These principles can also be applied in fields such as engineering, biomechanics, and robotics. Understanding the fundamentals of dynamics and mechanics can help you make informed decisions and solve problems in various practical scenarios.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
892
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
958
Replies
3
Views
618
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
317
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
900
Back
Top