Dynamics of Clifford generators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of Clifford generators in the context of a Hamiltonian defined by an antisymmetric matrix. The Hamiltonian is expressed as H=i∑(h_{μν}c_μc_ν) with c_μ representing Clifford algebra generators. The user seeks clarification on deriving the expression c_μ(t)=∑(e^(4h_{μν}t)c_ν(0)) from the differential equation dc_μ(t)/dt=i[H,c_μ(t)]. The confusion arises regarding the differentiation and integration of matrix exponentials, specifically the interpretation of e^(4ht) as a matrix exponential rather than element-wise exponentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Clifford algebra and its generators.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and quantum dynamics.
  • Knowledge of matrix exponentiation and its properties.
  • Experience with differential equations in the context of quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Clifford algebra generators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about matrix exponentials and their applications in quantum dynamics.
  • Investigate the derivation of solutions to differential equations involving Hamiltonians.
  • Explore the implications of antisymmetric matrices in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students working in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on the dynamics of quantum systems and the mathematical foundations of Clifford algebra.

tallphil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Trying to find the correct forum to post this, trying here because it is for a review essay I'm writing..

I've been trying to follow a proof in this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4050v2" (page 9).

The relevant build up:
[tex]c_\mu[/tex] are Clifford algebra generators, i.e. [tex]\{c_\mu,c_\nu\}=2\delta_{\mu\nu}I[/tex]

Consider a Hamiltonian of the form:
[tex]H=i\displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu\ne\nu=1}^{2n}h_{\mu\nu}c_\mu c_\nu[/tex]
where [tex]h_{\mu\nu}[/tex] is a real antisymmetric 2nx2n matrix of coefficients.

Then write [tex]c_\mu[/tex] as [tex]c_\mu(0)[/tex] and define [tex]c_\mu(t)=U(t)c_\mu(0)U(t)^\dagger[/tex] with [tex]U(t)=e^{iHt}[/tex].

It can then be shown that [tex]\frac{dc_\mu(t)}{dt}=i[H,c_\mu(t)]=\displaystyle\sum\limits_\nu 4h_{\mu\nu}c_\nu(t)[/tex]

The part that is not clear to me is then to hence show that
[tex]c_\mu(t)=\displaystyle\sum\limits_\nu e^{4h_{\mu\nu}t}c_\nu(0)[/tex]
in that I cannot differentiate this expression to get back to the previous line, let alone integrate the previous line to get this one (if that is indeed what is necessary).

Any help would be deeply appreciated, I have wasted far too much time today staring at this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the paper intends the expression e^(4ht) to be the matrix exponential. I.e. e^(4ht)=1+4ht+(4ht)^2/2!+(4ht)^3/3!+... where the powers are matrix multiplication. That's not the same as exponentiating each entry in the matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K