Dynamics in Motion: Solving Problems with Acceleration and Velocity Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter aatari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a puck's motion, which accelerates from rest at 5.0 m/s² over 80.0 cm, then moves at a constant speed for 4.0 seconds before stopping in 2.5 seconds. Participants clarify the use of kinematic equations, specifically noting that equation (4) cannot be used to determine the speed at the rough section due to the lack of time for that segment. The correct approach involves recognizing the three distinct phases of motion: constant acceleration, constant speed, and deceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Knowledge of constant acceleration and constant velocity concepts
  • Ability to analyze motion in segments
  • Familiarity with basic physics problem-solving techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of kinematic equations in different motion scenarios
  • Learn how to differentiate between constant acceleration and constant velocity
  • Practice solving physics problems involving multiple phases of motion
  • Explore advanced topics in kinematics, such as projectile motion and circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in mastering motion analysis in physical problems.

aatari
Messages
73
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Problem: [/B]During a pond hockey game, a puck accelerates from rest at 5.0 m/s 2over a distance of 80.0 cm. The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s until it reaches a rough section which causes it to stop in 2.5 s.

a. What is the speed of the object when it reaches the rough section?

Homework Equations


[/B]
a = (v2v1) / Δt..... (1)
Δd = v1Δt + ½aΔt2 ...(2)
Δd = (v22 v12) / 2a... (3)
v
2 = v1 + aΔt...... (4)
v22 = v12 + 2aΔd... (5)

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi guys, I know how to solve this question but I am having trouble understanding when to use which equation. And I am hoping one you can help me understand when to use what equation.

So for the question above we are asked to find the speed of the puck, which is very easy. The way I understand, we can solve this by either using equation (4) or equation (5). Both these equations will give us the final velocity. However, if I use equation 4 my answer is 20 m/s and if I use equation 5, I get 2.8 m/s. This is a significant difference and I don't understand why this is.

How do I figure out when to use what equation in situation like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aatari said:
The way I understand, we can solve this by either using equation (4) or equation (5).
How can you use equation (4)? You don't have the time.
 
Doc Al said:
How can you use equation (4)? You don't have the time.
The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s. Isn't time 4.0 s before the puck reaches the rough section?
 
aatari said:
The puck then slides with a constant speed for 4.0 s. Isn't time 4.0 s before the puck reaches the rough section?
That time is irrelevant for figuring out the speed.

Realize that there are two (really three!) segments to the motion, each quite different: (a) Constant acceleration as it moves from speed zero to some unknown speed; (b) Constant speed for 4 s until it hits the rough spot; (c) Constant acceleration as it slows down to rest.

To find that cruising speed, you must analyze segment (a). Equation (4) won't help you there.
 
Doc Al said:
That time is irrelevant for figuring out the speed.

Realize that there are two (really three!) segments to the motion, each quite different: (a) Constant acceleration as it moves from speed zero to some unknown speed; (b) Constant speed for 4 s until it hits the rough spot; (c) Constant acceleration as it slows down to rest.

To find that cruising speed, you must analyze segment (a). Equation (4) won't help you there.

Why and how is it irrelevant though? How can someone who is new to this topic in physics can figure this out?
 
aatari said:
Why and how is it irrelevant though?
The given 4.0 seconds is the time the puck was moving at constant speed. It's not the time it took to accelerate from zero to that speed (which is what equation 4 would require).

aatari said:
How can someone who is new to this topic in physics can figure this out?
You need to learn to recognize different types of motion: constant acceleration versus constant velocity, for one. The secret? Solve as many problems as you can! (That's how you get good.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aatari

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
930
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K