1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

E-field of non-conducting, nonuniform shell

  1. Jan 25, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Right have a shell that has a volym charge distribution P=(G/r^2) and with inner radius a and outer radius b.

    Now what is the e-field at r<a, a<r<b, r>b

    2. Relevant equations

    gauss's law: surfaceint[E.da]=Qenclosed/epsilon0

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Right this is what i tried.

    for r<a: there is no enclosed charge so E is zero at all points.

    for a<r<b:

    well first E is radially outwards and normal to the surface so the gauss integral just go to

    Qenclosed=volymint[PdV] between r and a

    goes to -> volymint[(G/r^2)(4[pi]r^2)dr] -> 4[pi]G*volymint[dr] evulated at r and a

    -> 4[pi]G(r-a)

    and E4[pi]r^2=(4[pi]G(r-a))/epsilon0
    which then goes to -> E=(G(r-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)

    then for r>b:

    it's the same calc as for a<r<b but we end up with E=(G(b-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)

    now i'm wondering have I done something wrong and if I had to plot it on a graph where we have E/r then for the first part upto a E would be zero and for the part where r>b it would follow a 1/r^2 relation, but how do i figure out the realation for part a<r<b, my algebra seems to suck a bit.. =)

    but yeah.. does this look correct?
    and if so, can you help me or give me a hint hwo to work out the relation.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 26, 2007 #2
    I am having some difficulty reading your equation, so I would not comment on them...

    For r<a, E=0..
    For a<r<b, E grows linearly..
    For b<r, E = Q/r^2 whereas Q = the total charge in the shell..
    E is continuous at r = a and r = b..

    If your solution satisfy the conditions above, your solution should be correct....
  4. Jan 27, 2007 #3
    pretty sure you are wrong.. outside the spherical shell E will be proportinal to 1/r^2 as for any other spherical charge..

    but inside the shell it will be proportinal to (1/r)-(1/r^2) following my equations, becuase the shell doesn't have uniform charge..

    also note the shell is non-conducting..
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?