E Raised to the Power of a Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter kq6up
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Power
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the matrix exponential \( e^M \) for the matrix \( M = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & -2 \\ -2 & 2 \end{pmatrix} \) using spectral decomposition. Participants debate the correctness of expressions involving the matrix and the use of hyperbolic functions. The correct computation of \( e^D \) is emphasized, with one participant noting that it can be done without symbolic math processors. The final results are confirmed to be accurate, but there is disagreement on the necessity and efficiency of converting results to hyperbolic functions. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity and simplicity in mathematical expressions.
kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Use a spectrally decomposed matrix and the power series to yield $$e^{M}$$ where $$M=\begin{pmatrix} 5 & -2 \\ -2 & 2 \end{pmatrix}$$.

Homework Equations



$${ M }^{ n }=C{ D }^{ n }{ C }^{ -1 }$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Is this correct? $${ e }^{ M }=\frac { 1 }{ 5 } \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 2 & \frac { -1 }{ 2 } \end{pmatrix}\left( \sum _{ i=0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac { \begin{pmatrix} { 1 }^{ n } & 0 \\ 0 & { 6 }^{ n } \end{pmatrix} }{ n! } } \right) \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 4 & -2 \end{pmatrix}$$

Thanks,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct, but you really should expand that out.
 
Is this better? $$CI{ C }^{ -1 }+CD{ C }^{ -1 }+\frac { 1 }{ 2 } C{ D }^{ 2 }{ C }^{ -1 }+\frac { 1 }{ 6 } C{ D }^{ 3 }{ C }^{ -1 }\dots$$.

Chris
 
No. It's a 2x2 matrix. There should be four simple expressions, one for each element of the matrix.
 
There might be some small error in there because when I use == with $$Ce^{D}C^-1$$ in Sage, I get a false. I am taking that to mean they are not equivalent.

$${ e }^{ 7/2 }\left( \begin{array}{rr} \frac { 1 }{ 2 } \, \cosh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) +\frac { 3 }{ 10 } \, \sinh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) & -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, \sinh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) \\ -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, \sinh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) & \frac { 1 }{ 2 } \, \cosh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) -\frac { 3 }{ 10 } \, \sinh \left( \frac { 5 }{ 2 } \right) \end{array} \right)$$

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
You should be able to compute ##\exp(D)## by hand. You do not need a symbolic math processor for this. You don't need a symbolic math processor for any of this. It's a product of three 2x2 matrices.
 
I did it by hand. I was just checking my results on Sage.

Chris
 
What did you do by hand? That matrix in post #5? How did you arrive at that result?

What did you calculate ##\exp(D)## to be?
 
There was another problem in the set that was similar, and I had the answer. So I knew that it would have sinh(x), cosh(x) in the answer because of this answer, so I just made it fit that form so I can use sinh(x) and cosh(x). It didn't come out as pretty I was hoping for.

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
  • #10
Yes, you can express this result using the hyperbolic functions. You made an error somewhere, however.

If you solve the problem as suggested you will *not* be using hyperbolic functions. What did you get for ##\exp(D)##? Did you even try doing that? That is part of what the question asks you to find. It is very simple result.
 
  • #11
Yes, exp(D) is $$\begin{pmatrix} { e }^{ 1 } & 0 \\ 0 & { e }^{ 6 } \end{pmatrix}$$.

Chris
 
  • #12
This is what I got before I tried to convert it to hyperbolic functions:

$$\left( \begin{array}{rr} \frac { 4 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 1 }{ 5 } \, e & -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e \\ -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e & \frac { 1 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 4 }{ 5 } \, e \end{array} \right) $$

I did it by hand and with Sage. I got the same result.

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
  • #13
That's the correct result. You made some error in converting that to hyperbolic expressions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #14
kq6up said:
This is what I got before I tried to convert it to hyperbolic functions:

$$\left( \begin{array}{rr} \frac { 4 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 1 }{ 5 } \, e & -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e \\ -\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 2 }{ 5 } \, e & \frac { 1 }{ 5 } \, e^{ 6 }+\frac { 4 }{ 5 } \, e \end{array} \right) $$

I did it by hand and with Sage. I got the same result.

Thanks,
Chris Maness

Why would you want to try to convert to hyperbolic functions? It would just make everything longer and messier. Isn't it easier to just write ##e## instead of ##\sinh(1)+\cosh(1)?##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K