How Can We Improve E-Waste Recycling for Smartphones?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of E-waste recycling for smartphones, highlighting that at least 70 of the 83 stable elements found in smartphones present significant recycling challenges. Current recycling processes primarily target valuable metals like gold and copper, while many elements are too cheap or present in minuscule quantities to justify recycling efforts. The conversation suggests that while chemical separation methods exist, economic viability remains a critical barrier. Government intervention is proposed as a potential solution to stabilize prices and encourage recycling of rare materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of E-waste recycling processes
  • Familiarity with chemical separation techniques
  • Knowledge of market economics related to raw materials
  • Awareness of environmental regulations regarding electronic waste
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced chemical separation methods for E-waste, such as sublimation
  • Explore the economic implications of recycling rare elements in smartphones
  • Investigate current E-waste recycling technologies and their efficiencies
  • Examine case studies on government interventions in raw material markets
USEFUL FOR

Environmental scientists, chemical engineers, policymakers, and anyone involved in E-waste management and recycling initiatives.

Evanish
Messages
120
Reaction score
10
I was reading an article about smart phones. Here is a quote from it..

"If you are wondering what chemistry has to do with smartphones, just look at the periodic table. Of the 83 stable (nonradioactive) elements, at least 70 of them can be found in smartphones! That’s 84% of all of the stable elements."
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/...ast-issues/archive-2014-2015/smartphones.html

I was wondering how difficult it would be to separate all 70 of the elements from each other for later reuse. I've done some reading about recycling before and it seems like only some (e.g. gold, copper) elements get recycled by current process. I would like to know more about the challenges of E-waste recycling, the current state of the industry and what the future might hold. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Evanish said:
I was reading an article about smart phones. Here is a quote from it..

"If you are wondering what chemistry has to do with smartphones, just look at the periodic table. Of the 83 stable (nonradioactive) elements, at least 70 of them can be found in smartphones! That’s 84% of all of the stable elements."
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/...ast-issues/archive-2014-2015/smartphones.html

I was wondering how difficult it would be to separate all 70 of the elements from each other for later reuse. I've done some reading about recycling before and it seems like only some (e.g. gold, copper) elements get recycled by current process. I would like to know more about the challenges of E-waste recycling, the current state of the industry and what the future might hold. Thanks.

It might be chemically and scientifically possible to separate the elements into more manageable and useful compounds, materials or atoms. This is one example of chemical pollution and problems of the future. Very debatable topic.

It could be possible to separate the atoms by looking at how different molecules change state at different temperatures and "capture" them as they evaporate.
Your question is very interesting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evanish
Doable - yes. Economically viable - that's where things get difficult.

Many of the elements used are way too cheap to be worth recycling. Even those rare and expensive can be present in such a minute quantities (say, dopants in semiconductors are used in ppb amounts, that means that the phone may contain less than nanograms of them) that trying top recycle them is way too expensive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evanish
Ivan Samsonov said:
It could be possible to separate the atoms by looking at how different molecules change state at different temperatures and "capture" them as they evaporate.

Really no need to reinvent the wheel, there are many methods of separating substances, this is a huge area of research in chemical engineering, one that is several hundred years old.

What you describe sounds more or less like separation by sublimation, but - just to see how many possibilities there are - take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_process
 
Borek said:
Really no need to reinvent the wheel, there are many methods of separating substances, this is a huge area of research in chemical engineering, one that is several hundred years old.

What you describe sounds more or less like separation by sublimation, but - just to see how many possibilities there are - take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_process

Yes, as you said it is a very broad area of research in chemistry. There are really many different techniques of separation!
 
Evanish said:
I would like to know more about the challenges of E-waste recycling
The most challenging part is to keep the process cheap enough, while the remaining stuff is still harmless enough.

To remove the few elements which worth reprocessing (by the actual prices for raw materials), it usually takes quite a chemistry, and the waste-of-waste still requires further processing afterward before it can be deposited. No wonder that electronic waste is considered as a good material to be exported to countries with less strict rules for electronic waste processing.

So, actually the most challenging part is not closely related to chemistry. The challenge is to keep the dirt at home.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evanish
Borek said:
Doable - yes. Economically viable - that's where things get difficult.

Many of the elements used are way too cheap to be worth recycling. Even those rare and expensive can be present in such a minute quantities (say, dopants in semiconductors are used in ppb amounts, that means that the phone may contain less than nanograms of them) that trying top recycle them is way too expensive.
I've thought about this issue. I wonder if government intervention might be appropriate for this problem. At least for some of the more rare elements. The government can buy these elements up until they reach some set price. This will encourage recycling because the price will be higher and stable. It will also lead the government have a strategic reserve of these materials that they can sell to industries at a set price. Plus, since the materials are rare storage shouldn't be a big problem. Of course there are usually issues with government involvement in markets, but for such and important issue it seem like it might be warranted anyways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K