E1 Transitions: Finding the Minimal Emission Direction in a Hydrogen Atom

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the minimal emission direction for E1 transitions in a hydrogen atom in the state (|210>+|211>)/sqrt(2). The rate of emission is proportional to | \cdot \epsilon|^2, where F=(|210>-|211>)/sqrt(2) and I=(|210>+|211>)/sqrt(2). The key insight is that the diagonal terms <210|X|210> and <211|X|211> are zero, necessitating a focus on off-diagonal terms to evaluate the emission direction accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, particularly E1 transitions
  • Understanding of hydrogen atom states and notation
  • Familiarity with expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of polarization vectors in quantum transitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of E1 transitions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the calculation of expectation values for quantum states
  • Explore the role of polarization vectors in emission processes
  • Investigate symmetry arguments in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic transitions and emission processes in hydrogen atoms.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372

Homework Statement


A hydrogen atom is in state (|210>+|211>)/sqrt(2) relative to some fixed coordinate system. Assume only E1 transitions contribute. To which direction in space the rate of emission will be minimal?



Homework Equations


The rate of emission is proportional to
[tex]|<F|X|I> \cdot \epsilon|^2[/tex]
where F is the final state and I is initial state.
F=(|210>-|211>)/sqrt(2)
I=(|210>+|211>)/sqrt(2)
epsilon is polarization vector.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to find epsilon here, the TA said that <F|X|I> should be complex valued but if I am not mistaken it equals 0.5(<210|X|210>-<211|X|211>), and this is real valued.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MathematicalPhysicist,

Your formula for the expectation value isn't quite right. You should be able to check, either by symmetry arguments or by direct evaluation, that the diagonal terms you've written are zero. It may be useful to look again at the off diagonal terms.

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K