First order pertubation of L_y operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
renec112
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
Hi, I am trying to solve an exam question i failed. It's abput pertubation of hydrogen.
I am given the following information:

The matrix representation of [tex]L_y[/tex] is given by:
[tex]L_y = \frac{i \hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \left[\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \end{array}\right][/tex]

The hydrogen atom is now being pertubed by:
[tex]H' = \alpha L_y[/tex]

Task: Find the first order energyshift for n = 2
[tex]\{\psi_{200}, \psi_{21-1},\psi_{210},\psi_{211}\}[/tex]
with the pertubationMy attempt
I'll have to use degenerte pertubation theory, which states i can find the new energy shift by:
[tex]E^1_{\pm} = \frac{1}{2} ( W_{aa}+W_{bb} \pm \sqrt{(W_{aa}-W_{aa})^2 + 4 W_{ab}|^2}[/tex]
where
[tex]W_{ab} = <\psi^0_a | H' | \psi^0_b >[/tex]

I started by looking at the part
[tex]H' | \psi^0_b >[/tex]
which by simple matrix algebra gives me (let's call it A)
[tex]A = \frac{i \alpha \hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \left[\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \psi_{210} & 0 \\ 0 & -\psi_{21-1} & 0 & \psi_{211} \\ 0 & 0 & -\psi_{210} & 0 \end{array}\right][/tex]

This is where i fail, i think. Because now i have to do some eigenvalue problem at
[tex]W_{ab} = <\psi^0_a | A = \frac{i \alpha \hbar}{\sqrt{2}} [\psi_{200}, \psi_{21-1},\psi_{210},\psi_{211}] \left[\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \psi_{210} & 0 \\ 0 & -\psi_{21-1} & 0 & \psi_{211} \\ 0 & 0 & -\psi_{210} & 0 \end{array}\right][/tex]
And I'm not sure how i should do it. If i need to do some calculations first or something.

I would very much appreciate some hints :) !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that you are mixing up what is a matrix element and what is a matrix. In the expression for ##W_{ab}##, what you have is a matrix element, not a matrix.

The ket state ##|\psi^0_a\rangle## is not a vector containing the ##\psi^0_a##, it is a set of different vectors, taking a different value depending on the value of ##a##. For example, in your representation, with ##a = 200##, that vector would be ##(1,0,0,0)^T##.

Furthermore, the expression you have given for the energy shifts of the degenerate perturbation theory is only valid for a two-level degenerate system while you are dealing with a 4-level degenerate system.

The more general approach to degenerate perturbation theory is to look at the restriction of your perturbation to the degenerate subspace, in your case this is a 4-level system, and find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors.Edit: A ##\LaTeX## hint: < and > are relations and are typeset as such. What you are looking for when constructing bras and kets are \langle and \rangle. Compare ##|\psi>## to ##|\psi\rangle##.
 
Thank you very much for the reply Orodruin.
So i understand i'll need to construct the 4-4 matrix and find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. I should construct this matrix by running
[tex]W_{ab} = \langle \psi^0_a | H' | \psi^0_b \rangle[/tex]

I tried this but the matrix i am getting out is:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right][/tex]
So i think I'm failing here.

Just to clarify my mistake, this is my approach to construct the matrix is to first look at, say column 2:
[tex]W_{ab} = \langle \psi^0_a | \alpha L_y | \psi^0_{21-1} \rangle[/tex]
discard all constants for now, and do basic matrix algebra from [tex]L_y[/tex]

[tex]\langle \psi^0_a |L_y | \psi^0_{21-1} \rangle = \langle \psi^0_a | \left[\begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & -\psi_{210} & 0 \end{array}\right][/tex]

Now i have to try all 4 a's. But i only get something from psi 210, because it's the only orthogonal one. So i can see the only thing giving me something in column two is:
[tex]\langle \psi^0_{210}| \alpha L_y | \psi^0_{21-1} \rangle = -1[/tex]
+ some constants.

What do you think?
 
Orodruin said:
The procedure seems more or less correct. However, the third column is not correct.
I see - thank you very much for you help :) !