Early planning for grad school

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around early planning for graduate school in physics, specifically focusing on the preparation needed for admission into top programs in theoretical particle physics. Participants explore topics such as course selection, the importance of research experience, and the role of GRE scores and GPA in the admissions process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about whether top physics programs require a strong math background or a math major, suggesting that math courses are important.
  • Another participant emphasizes the value of numerical analysis and specific mathematical techniques for physics, such as modeling partial differential equations.
  • There is a discussion about the trade-offs between GRE scores, grades, courses, and research experience in the admissions process, with varying opinions on their relative importance.
  • Participants mention the need for a high GPA, with some suggesting a target of 3.99+ for top schools, while others note that grading policies vary across institutions.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambitious goal of completing QFT within four years, with advice to maintain a balanced course load and consider non-physics classes.
  • Some participants suggest that taking QFT and GR early can be beneficial for future studies and research opportunities, while others caution about the difficulty of these courses.
  • There is curiosity about the competitiveness of UK programs in theoretical physics compared to top US schools, with no definitive consensus on their standing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of a solid math foundation and the challenges of balancing coursework with personal well-being. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the specific requirements for graduate school admissions, the significance of GRE scores, and the relative standing of UK programs compared to US institutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the exact admissions statistics and policies of various graduate programs, noting that these can vary significantly. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the impact of undergraduate institutions on admissions outcomes.

cmogni
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
early "planning" for grad school

I'm currently a freshman at JHU, and I know that it is very early to think about grad school, but there are a few things that I've been wondering about. I definitely am majoring in physics, and I'm taking the second year physics sequence (special relativity, waves, classical mechanics II, and modern physics (intro to quantum physics basically)). By the time I'm done with school, if I stay for four years, I will have completed through QFT and many other graduate level classes. I was originally thinking of majoring in math, but the department seems pretty weak here, and a lot of the math that I'd take wouldn't seem that relevant to physics.

So I guess I have a few questions. Would top programs in physics (specifically theoretical particle physics) want to see that I've taken many math classes or altogether majored in math? Which math courses would be the most useful to take for physics? There is a mathematical methods year-long class, but of course that can't cover everything. I'm most likely going to start conducting research under a faculty member either later in this semester or during my spring semester. It seems like the undergraduates here don't just do grunt work for research. What's the trade-off between GREs/grades/courses/research in the admissions process? Finally, what do you think would be a good GPA in physics and math courses to stay above?

A lot of these might be newbie questions, but I'd appreciate any help I could get for my case specifically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd strongly suggest you learn as much numerical analysis as possible. In addition to all the basics (Numerical linear algerbra, root-finding, polynomial approximation, etc) learn something about modeling partial differential equations. This is extremely useful to know about and many physics undergrads do not have this background.
 


cmogni said:
Would top programs in physics (specifically theoretical particle physics) want to see that I've taken many math classes or altogether majored in math?

Yes. Any physics program would want to see the math courses.

What's the trade-off between GREs/grades/courses/research in the admissions process?

Good grades are a must. Of the other three, a strong 2/3 can make up for the other, weaker one...but obviously you should try to leave as few holes in your candidacy as possible.

Finally, what do you think would be a good GPA in physics and math courses to stay above?

3.99+ for the top schools. It goes down from there. This isn't really a meaningful question.
 


Do the schools release admissions statistics? If so, where could I find them? Does your undergraduate institution have any effect on admissions?
 


cmogni said:
Do the schools release admissions statistics? If so, where could I find them? Does your undergraduate institution have any effect on admissions?

I don't know if all schools do this, but my university publishes all of the average scores, GPA's, and a ton of additional information every year. How many people did what program, what the average GPA for that was, how many of those were international students, male, female, etc..
 


cmogni said:
If so, where could I find them? Does your undergraduate institution have any effect on admissions?

Some, but again... "it depends." It's a lot more what you make of your undergraduate education than where you make it, though.
 


cmogni said:
By the time I'm done with school, if I stay for four years, I will have completed through QFT and many other graduate level classes.

If you really to manage to get through QFT in four years of undergraduate work, you really won't have any problem getting into a decent grad school. However, remember that this is an extremely ambitious goal, and few undergraduates get through QFT, and there are large areas of physics where QFT isn't essential in grad school.

Two things:

1) Don't burn yourself out.
2) It's a good idea to take some classes that don't have anything to do with physics (i.e. art, literature, and philosophy).

Would top programs in physics (specifically theoretical particle physics) want to see that I've taken many math classes or altogether majored in math?

It's essential that you've covered the basics. Above that then a lot depends on the grad school.

Which math courses would be the most useful to take for physics?

The essential set of skills are partial differential equations, linear algebra, and complex analysis. Above that there are a number of directions you can go. Numerical analysis is something that is typically under taught in the standard physics curriculum.

What's the trade-off between GREs/grades/courses/research in the admissions process?

Depends on the particular grad school. The ranking for the ones that I'm familiar with is research/courses/grades/GRE, but different schools can have very different policies.

Finally, what do you think would be a good GPA in physics and math courses to stay above?

You need to have a decent GPA, but once you have something reasonable, it becomes much harder to tell the quality of a student because different schools have different grading policies.
 


Try taking QFT as soon as you can handle it. In fact, make it your medium term goal to take QFT as soon as you can. Invest most of your time into it, since it is a complete lifechanger. It really opens you many doors in terms of advanced courses and research. Not to mention it's the only way of learning if you really want to do particle physics. It's best if you learn that before actually applying to grad school.

Also take GR as soon as you can, since it doesn't really have any prereqs. As a freshman you'd have about as much background as a usual grad student (since not many take Riemannian geometry).

GR and QFT will really set you up. They are difficult courses which will require you to borrow tens of books from the library, but they're really worth it.
 


Thanks for all the help thus far (the more the merrier however haha). @negru: that was my goal. I want to get through QFT and GR right when I am able to do so. I don't know when I'll take GR, but it'll definitely be anywhere from sophomore to senior year depending upon how my schedule plays out. @two-fishquant: I definitely know the risks of burning myself out, and I plan on maintaining a balance in my studies and life. Although I haven't been able to for a few weeks, I usually run often. I also play the piano (quite well), and I am taking some Classics classes right now which are a nice break from math and science.

As a disclaimer, I don't want to sound like I am planning way too far ahead and trying to map out the next ten years of my life. I'm just a little curious as to what I need to expect in the coming years. I'll have to deal with it eventually, and I like to have that overarching goal in the back of my mind.

That having been said, what's the general consensus on UK programs in theoretical physics (ie Cambridge, Oxford, and Imperial)? I've always been interested in UK universities, but I don't know how they stack up when it comes to physics to the top physics schools here (eg Princeton, Harvard, Berkeley, etc).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K