Earth Core Temperature: Causes & Impact

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the causes and implications of the Earth's core temperature, estimated to be around 4000 degrees Celsius. Participants explore whether the core generates its own energy through mechanisms such as radioactive decay and gravitational effects, and how this heat might influence the mantle and surface of the Earth through convection. The conversation also touches on the longevity of this temperature over billions of years and the potential consequences of extreme pressure and heat at the Earth's center.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the Earth's core produces its own energy and suggest mechanisms like radioactive decay and gravity as potential sources.
  • There is a discussion about the inner core growing and releasing latent heat during the freezing process, which some participants argue contributes to the core's temperature.
  • Most participants agree that radiogenic heating in the Earth's core is minimal, with specific isotopes being largely absent from the core.
  • Some participants propose that the core's heat is essential for maintaining the Earth's magnetic field, while others debate the amount of heat flux required across the core-mantle boundary, with estimates varying significantly.
  • A participant raises a hypothetical scenario regarding the effects of extreme pressure and heat at the Earth's center, questioning the implications of reaching a "peak value" of temperature.
  • Another participant challenges the concept of a "peak value" without defining it, questioning the feasibility of the core reaching such extreme temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms of energy production in the Earth's core and the implications of core temperature on geological processes. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing opinions on the significance of radiogenic heating and the heat flux across the core-mantle boundary.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in defining terms like "peak value" in the context of core temperature and pressure, as well as assumptions regarding the role of various isotopes in heating the core. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on these complex geological processes.

Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Dear PF Forum,
Does the Earth core produces its own energy?
If it is true, how? Radioactive decay? Gravity?
Earth core temperature is around 4000 celsius. Almost like the sun surface temperature.
How can that temperature kept for 4 billions of year?
Can the temperature heat the mantle and Earth surface through convection heat transfer?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Stephanus said:
Does the Earth core produces its own energy?
If it is true, how? Radioactive decay? Gravity?
Earth core temperature is around 4000 celsius. Almost like the sun surface temperature.
How can that temperature kept for 4 billions of year?
Can the temperature heat the mantle and Earth surface through convection heat transfer?

How can that temperature kept for 4 billions of year?
The Earth is big, and rock isn't a very good conductor of heat.Does the Earth core produces its own energy?
Yes, it does. The Earth's inner core is growing. To melt something, you need to supply heat. Melting is an endothermic process. The opposite, freezing, is an exothermic process. The growth of the inner core releases latent heat. Gravity also plays a role. This freezing selectively concentrates iron and nickel in the inner core, leaving lighter impurities in the molten outer core, thereby releasing gravitational energy.

Most (but not all) geophysicists are of the opinion that there is very little radiogenic heating in the Earth's core. The four isotopes responsible for almost all of the Earth's radiogenic heating are uranium 238, uranium 235, thorium 232, and potassium 40. Chemically, uranium, thorium, and potassium are lithophile elements, which means they are found in rock (not in the core). Moreover, they are incompatible elements, which means they are concentrated in the Earth's crust. Those elements should be very strongly depleted in the Earth's core. (Some geophysicists think there may be some potassium 40 in the Earth's outer core.)Can the temperature heat the mantle and Earth surface through convection heat transfer?
The Earth has a magnetic field. Two things are needed for this: A rotating fluid that conducts electricity, and convection in the fluid (i.e., a heat flux through the fluid). The Earth's core has to be heating the mantle; if it wasn't, we wouldn't have a magnetic field. Mars has a liquid inner core but doesn't have a magnetic field; this is presumably because Mars has a stagnant lid rather than plate tectonics.

The amount of heat flux needed to sustain the magnetic field is subject to debate. Different geophysicists agree to disagree. Most think it is about 5 terawatts across the core-mantle boundary. Others think less is needed. How much heat actually flows across the core-mantle boundary is also subject to debate. Most geophysicists think it is between 5 and 15 terawatts. Some argue for a smaller number, others for an even bigger number, making the range 2 to 17 terawatts. As an interested bystander, those widely varying numbers means that a lot more work needs to be done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus and praveena
D H said:
How can that temperature kept for 4 billions of year?
The Earth is big, and rock isn't a very good conductor of heat.Does the Earth core produces its own energy?
Yes, it does. The Earth's inner core is growing. To melt something, you need to supply heat. Melting is an endothermic process. The opposite, freezing, is an exothermic process. The growth of the inner core releases latent heat. Gravity also plays a role. This freezing selectively concentrates iron and nickel in the inner core, leaving lighter impurities in the molten outer core, thereby releasing gravitational energy.

Most (but not all) geophysicists are of the opinion that there is very little radiogenic heating in the Earth's core. The four isotopes responsible for almost all of the Earth's radiogenic heating are uranium 238, uranium 235, thorium 232, and potassium 40. Chemically, uranium, thorium, and potassium are lithophile elements, which means they are found in rock (not in the core). Moreover, they are incompatible elements, which means they are concentrated in the Earth's crust. Those elements should be very strongly depleted in the Earth's core. (Some geophysicists think there may be some potassium 40 in the Earth's outer core.)Can the temperature heat the mantle and Earth surface through convection heat transfer?
The Earth has a magnetic field. Two things are needed for this: A rotating fluid that conducts electricity, and convection in the fluid (i.e., a heat flux through the fluid). The Earth's core has to be heating the mantle; if it wasn't, we wouldn't have a magnetic field. Mars has a liquid inner core but doesn't have a magnetic field; this is presumably because Mars has a stagnant lid rather than plate tectonics.

The amount of heat flux needed to sustain the magnetic field is subject to debate. Different geophysicists agree to disagree. Most think it is about 5 terawatts across the core-mantle boundary. Others think less is needed. How much heat actually flows across the core-mantle boundary is also subject to debate. Most geophysicists think it is between 5 and 15 terawatts. Some argue for a smaller number, others for an even bigger number, making the range 2 to 17 terawatts. As an interested bystander, those widely varying numbers means that a lot more work needs to be done.
Is there is any possibility when the pressure & heat at the centre of Earth reaches it's most peak value? And this results the Earth to broken into pieces? Orelse only the tectonic plates may have a large movement even when the core reaches it's maximum pressure & heat?
 
praveena said:
Is there is any possibility when the pressure & heat at the centre of Earth reaches it's most peak value? And this results the Earth to broken into pieces? Orelse only the tectonic plates may have a large movement even when the core reaches it's maximum pressure & heat?
"Peak value"? And what would that be? 1 million kelvin? Well, if the core of the Earth reaches that high, a 1000 km sphere at 1 million kelvin, it will surely destroy the earth. But how can it reach that heat? And you haven't defined what is the "peak value"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: praveena

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
9K