Earth time dilation vs Sun time dilation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time dilation effects experienced on Earth versus the Sun, as presented in the MinutePhysics video "How long is a day in the Sun?" It establishes that 24 hours on Earth equates to 86,400.0 seconds, while on the Sun, 86,400.2 seconds pass. This leads to the conclusion that a twin on the Sun would age slower than a twin on Earth due to the effects of gravitational time dilation, contradicting the video's assertion that more time has elapsed on the Sun. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of accurately conveying these concepts through natural language.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational time dilation
  • Familiarity with the principles of general relativity
  • Knowledge of the concept of twin paradox in physics
  • Basic comprehension of time measurement in different gravitational fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of gravitational time dilation in general relativity
  • Investigate the twin paradox and its resolutions in physics literature
  • Study the effects of mass on time perception and measurement
  • Review the MinutePhysics video series for further insights on time and relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining time dilation concepts, and anyone interested in the implications of general relativity on time measurement.

orion1977
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the MinutePhysics video "How long is a day in the Sun?" it is said 24 hours on Earth is 86,400.0 seconds, but on the Sun 86,400.2 seconds would pass.

However, if time passes slower with more massed objects, then wouldn't a twin on the Sun be younger than a twin on the Earth? If so, is the video wrong in saying more time has elapsed on the Sun?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
orion1977 said:
In the MinutePhysics video "How long is a day in the Sun?" it is said 24 hours on Earth is 86,400.0 seconds, but on the Sun 86,400.2 seconds would pass.

However, if time passes slower with more massed objects, then wouldn't a twin on the Sun be younger than a twin on the Earth? If so, is the video wrong in saying more time has elapsed on the Sun?


I suppose they mean 86,400.2 earth-seconds would pass while you measure only 86,400 seconds on the sun. So time would flow slightly slower, and the Earth twin would age more (by .2 seconds per day).
 
orion1977 said:
However, if time passes slower with more massed objects, then wouldn't a twin on the Sun be younger than a twin on the Earth? If so, is the video wrong in saying more time has elapsed on the Sun?
Natural language isn't well adapted for describing things like this unambiguously. As @Gan_HOPE326 says, if you put a clock on the surface of the Sun and sat on Earth with a powerful telescope watching that clock, it would not show that 86,400s had elapsed until slightly more had passed on your own clock. The Sun-based clock would always have a lower (and getting farther behind) reading than your clock - so it would be younger than yours by an increasing margin.

I haven't checked their numbers.
 
Last edited:
Ibix said:
Natural language isn't well adapted for describing things like this unambiguously.

(slight aside: it's funny I should read this remark today as I've just started reading the story from which the movie "Arrival" is adapted and

it dwells a lot on how different the language as well as the physics of an alien race with an a-temporal perspective is. For example they find extremely natural and fundamental the concept of "action" while they need to derive quantities such as velocity. Similar considerations I assume would apply to someone who developed in a context in which relativistic effects are daily occurrences.

)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K