Time Dilation: Orbit Earth at Light Speed, What Happens?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of time dilation, particularly in the context of an observer orbiting the Earth at speeds close to the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of time dilation on the perception of time and motion from the perspective of the orbiting observer compared to observers on Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether, during time dilation, everything on Earth would appear to move faster or if it would look normal, suggesting a confusion about the effects of time dilation on visual perception.
  • Another participant asserts that everything would move twice as fast as normal, but notes that this differs from cases of inertial motion in flat spacetime, introducing the Doppler effect as a complicating factor.
  • A participant references the twin paradox, explaining that the orbiting observer's clock falls behind due to taking a curved path through spacetime, while the Earth clock follows a straight path.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of straight paths in curved spacetime, arguing that the clock on Earth also follows a curved path due to proper acceleration, and discusses the conditions under which the paths of the clocks may differ in length.
  • A participant introduces a thought experiment about maximizing proper time between events on Earth's surface, suggesting that free-fall paths can yield longer proper times compared to remaining on the surface.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of gravitational effects and special relativity (SR) versus general relativity (GR) in analyzing the scenario, with one noting that the gravitational field of the Earth is negligible in this case.
  • Another participant mentions a specific metric related to rotating frames of reference, indicating a more technical approach to the discussion.
  • One participant reiterates the initial question about time dilation and visual perception, affirming that everything would appear to move faster and referencing a related episode from a science fiction series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how time dilation affects the perception of motion. While some assert that everything would appear to move faster, others introduce complexities related to the Doppler effect and the nature of paths through spacetime, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions about the nature of paths in curved spacetime, the effects of acceleration, and the implications of special versus general relativity. The discussion includes references to specific scenarios and thought experiments that may not be universally agreed upon.

Drizy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I’m having quite a bit of trouble understanding time dilation. What will happen if you orbit the Earth close to the speed of light, 1 h passes for you and due to time dilation 2 h on earth. So what will happen when you look at Earth in that hour. Since time passes 2 times faster there will it look like everything moves 2 times faster or will everything just look normal?
Or is it something else?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drizy said:
Since time passes 2 times faster there will it look like everything moves 2 times faster or will everything just look normal?
Everything will move twice as fast as mormal.

Note that this is different from the case of inertial motion in flat spacetime, which is the case usually covered in introductory relativity sources. In that case, you would literally see someone you passed moving fast as you approached and slow as you receded. But this is due to the Doppler effect and once you correct for that you would calculate that the person was moving slow.

I would suggest that it's probably worth getting your head around the inertial case before trying to understand non-inertial motion.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jartsa and etotheipi
So this is the twin paradox question once again.

So the orbiting observer takes a curved path through the space-time, while a clock on Earth takes a straight path through the space-time. That's why the orbiting observer's clock falls behind the clock on earth.
 
Last edited:
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and PeroK
jartsa said:
the orbiting observer takes a curved path through the space-time, while a clock on Earth takes a straight path through the space-time.

No. In curved spacetime, not all straight paths have maximal length, and straight paths are not always longer than curved paths.

The clock on Earth's path is curved, because it has nonzero proper acceleration. The orbiting clock's path might be straight or it might be curved, depending on the orbital speed; for the right orbital speed, the one that allows a free-fall orbit, the orbiting clock's path will be straight. The OP specified an orbital speed close to the speed of light, though, so in that case the orbiting clock's path will be curved, since it will take a very large inward proper acceleration to keep it in orbit. But even a clock in free-fall orbit, for low enough orbital altitudes, will have a shorter path through spacetime than a clock on Earth, even though a free-fall orbiting clock's path through spacetime is straight.

Even in curved spacetime, there will always be some straight path that is of maximal length, but it might take some effort to find it. In the case under discussion, consider this straight path: a clock is moving upward, radially, and passes the orbiting clock at the same instant the orbiting clock is directdly overhead of the Earth clock. (We are idealizing the Earth as non-rotating for this thought experiment; the Earth's rotation adds further complications.) The radially moving clock has just the right velocity so that it rises upward, decelerates, comes to a stop, starts falling back downward, and passes the orbiting clock again at the same instant the orbiting clock has completed exactly one orbit and is again directly overhead of the Earth clock. The radially moving clock will then have the longest path through spacetime between the two meetings.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, etotheipi and PeroK
Let's pretend the Earth didn't rotate, for simplicity. We might ask - what sort of path maximizes the proper time between a couple of events on the Earth's surface?

For short time intervals, the answer is unique. You start at the start event, throw the object upwards just hard enough so that it comes back down to the end event, and is in free fall throughlut. Writing out the proper time integral may help see why this is a longer path than just staying on the Earth's surface. In a frame dependent analysis, the velocity upwards caues velocity time dilation, which hurts, but it gets you out of the gravitational time dilation, that helps.

Feynman mentioned this , as a question he asked his students, though I don't recall where.

The solution becomes non-unique when you have a period long enough that an orbit around the Earth is possible.

This applies in general to curved spatial surfaces,as well as curves space-time. Let's consider an example of two towns on a curved surface - specificallly, they are separated by a very tall hill. What's the shortest (since this is a spatial-only problem, the metric is positive definie) path between the towns?

There is a straight-line (more formally, geodesic) path between the towns that goes over the hill. But for a tall enough hill, there's a shorter geodesic path that goes around the hill. Both paths are constructed to be geodesics, but in the case where there are multiple geodesics connecting two points, one geodesic may be shorter than the other even though they both "extremize" the geodesic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory and PeroK
Because light travels seven and half turns in a second around the Earth, it takes 1/7.5 second for one turn for the clocks on the Earth. Corresponding time of the almost light speed pilot is almost zero. The Earth people interpret it by SR. The pilot who regards he is at still interprets it by GR.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Because light travels seven and half turns in a second around the Earth, it takes 1/7.5 second for one turn for the clocks on the Earth. Corresponding time of the almost light speed pilot is almost zero. The Earth people interpret it by SR. The pilot who regards he is at still interprets it by GR.
Given that the gravitational field of the Earth is negligible in this case, the whole scenario can be analysed using SR, with one inertial and one accelerating observer.
 
Yes, it can be. I said it can also be explained by the metric of rotating FOR.
g_{00}=1-\frac{r^2\omega^2}{c^2}
 
Drizy said:
I’m having quite a bit of trouble understanding time dilation. What will happen if you orbit the Earth close to the speed of light, 1 h passes for you and due to time dilation 2 h on earth. So what will happen when you look at Earth in that hour. Since time passes 2 times faster there will it look like everything moves 2 times faster or will everything just look normal?
Or is it something else?

Thanks
Yes, everything will moves 2 times faster
Please watch this episode for a similar situation:
Star Trek Voyager 6-12-Blink of an Eye (2000)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708856/
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Motore and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
568
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K