Easy - determining n from orbital radius

  • Thread starter Thread starter t_n_p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital Radius
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the principal quantum number for a hydrogen atom based on a specified orbital radius of 0.01 mm. The context involves quantum mechanics and atomic structure, specifically the behavior of electrons in hydrogen-like atoms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the principal quantum number using the formula for orbital radius, questioning the validity of the resulting non-integer and large value. There are inquiries about rounding values and the implications of using approximate measurements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on rounding values and the nature of quantum states. Some participants clarify the concept of excited states and the corresponding principal quantum numbers for hydrogen-like atoms, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the approximation involved in the given radius and the implications of using such a value in calculations. Participants also note the differences in atomic numbers for various hydrogen-like ions, which may affect the quantum number determination.

t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the hydrogen atom, determine the principle quantum number corresponding to an orbital of radius Rn=0.01mm

Homework Equations


I'm using the following formula:

Rn=(n^2)(Ao)/Z

Where Rn is the orbital radius (0.01mm),
n is the principle quantum number (wanted)
Ao is a constant (0.5*10^-10)
and Z is the atomic number (for hydrogen =1)

The Attempt at a Solution


By converting Rn into metres and subbing in all the other values I obtain a value of n=447.2135955.

Obviously there are two discreptancies:
1) n is not a whole number
2) it is abnormally large

Can anybody show me where I have gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i) it's not a whole number because 0.01mm is an approximate value. ii) It's abnormally large because an 0.01mm hydrogen atom is abnormally large. It doesn't seem out of line to me.
 
Would I answer this with a rounded value then?

A lead on question asks: for this value of principle quantum number, find the correspongind excited state energy.

Thus E=-13.6Z^2/(n^2) becomes

E=-13.6/(447.2135955^2)=-6.8*10^-5 eV

(notice for this part I did not use the rounded value)
 
There is no orbital at exactly 0.01mm. So yes, you round. It shouldn't matter much.
 
I have another question, slightly different topic

-Calculate the first excited state energies of He+, Li2+ and Be3+ compare them with the ground state energy of hydrogen.

ground state means n=1, but how do i find n for the first excited state? does it differ for each of the 3 cases above?
 
Last edited:
Yes, n=1 in all those cases. Look at your formula. What could change?
 
atomic number is going to be different for each of those cases. But since I want to find the first excited state of He+... don't I need to use the relevant principle quantum number?

Not sure if I've missed something here, but how do I determine the principle quantum number (n) for the first excited state in the three above cases?
 
They are all hydrogen-like one-electron atoms. The first excited state is n=2. Just like hydrogen. (Sorry if I said n=1 before, I missed the 'excited state'). The n's designate the state. n=1 is ground. The first state above ground is the first excited state. Must be n=2.
 
cool, a lot clearer now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K