MHB Eb 4.d determine the magnitude and direction of V

AI Thread Summary
The magnitude of vector V is calculated as approximately 11.70 units, using the formula √((-9.8)² + (-6.4)²). The direction initially calculated as 33.15° is corrected to 213.15° by adding 180° since both components are negative, placing it in quadrant III. The discussion also addresses the use of symbols for magnitude and direction, with suggestions for alternatives to arrows on graphs. Additionally, the proper LaTeX command for the degree symbol is noted as ^{\circ}. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly determining vector direction based on quadrant placement.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{\\ eb 4.d}$
$\textsf{If $v_x=-9.80$ units and $v_y=-6.40$ units,}\\$
$\textit{determine the magnitude and direction of $V$.}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
magnitude&=\sqrt{(-9.8)^2+(-6.4)^2}
=\color{red}{11.7047}\\
direction&=\arctan{\left[\frac{6.4}{-9.8}\right]}
=\color{red}{33.15^o}
\end{align*}

ok the direction is actually in the Q4 but $\arctan{\left[\frac{-6.4}{-9.8}\right]}$
is in Q1! Do we just add $180^o$ for that or is it $-33.15^o$

Also is there symbols for magnitude and direction other than an arrow on the graph

Also where is the latex for degree instead of ^o
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\tiny{\\ eb 4.d}$
$\textsf{If $v_x=-9.80$ units and $v_y=-6.40$ units,}\\$
$\textit{determine the magnitude and direction of $V$.}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
magnitude&=\sqrt{(-9.8)^2+(-6.4)^2}
=\color{red}{11.7047}\\
direction&=\arctan{\left[\frac{6.4}{-9.8}\right]}
=\color{red}{33.15^o}
\end{align*}

ok the direction is actually in the Q4 but $\arctan{\left[\frac{-6.4}{-9.8}\right]}$
is in Q1! Do we just add $180^o$ for that or is it $-33.15^o$

The direction would be in quadrant III, and so recognizing that both components are negative, you would in fact add $\pi$ to the angle:

$$\theta=\pi+\arctan\left(\frac{v_y}{v_x}\right)$$

karush said:
Also is there symbols for magnitude and direction other than an arrow on the graph

Also where is the latex for degree instead of ^o

I use ^{\circ} for the degree symbol.
 
MarkFL said:
The direction would be in quadrant III, and so recognizing that both components are negative, you would in fact add $\pi$ to the angle:

$$\theta=\pi+\arctan\left(\frac{v_y}{v_x}\right)$$

$\textsf{ok so it}$ $$33.15^\circ + 180^\circ = 213.15^\circ $$
that would place it Q3

MarkFL said:
I use ^{\circ} for the degree symbol.

actually why don't we have \degree on the Symbol/Command Set:
 
It was an oversight I suppose, but adding it now would require a lot of effort. :)
 
I completely understand:cool:
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top