MHB Eb 4.d determine the magnitude and direction of V

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{\\ eb 4.d}$
$\textsf{If $v_x=-9.80$ units and $v_y=-6.40$ units,}\\$
$\textit{determine the magnitude and direction of $V$.}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
magnitude&=\sqrt{(-9.8)^2+(-6.4)^2}
=\color{red}{11.7047}\\
direction&=\arctan{\left[\frac{6.4}{-9.8}\right]}
=\color{red}{33.15^o}
\end{align*}

ok the direction is actually in the Q4 but $\arctan{\left[\frac{-6.4}{-9.8}\right]}$
is in Q1! Do we just add $180^o$ for that or is it $-33.15^o$

Also is there symbols for magnitude and direction other than an arrow on the graph

Also where is the latex for degree instead of ^o
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\tiny{\\ eb 4.d}$
$\textsf{If $v_x=-9.80$ units and $v_y=-6.40$ units,}\\$
$\textit{determine the magnitude and direction of $V$.}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
magnitude&=\sqrt{(-9.8)^2+(-6.4)^2}
=\color{red}{11.7047}\\
direction&=\arctan{\left[\frac{6.4}{-9.8}\right]}
=\color{red}{33.15^o}
\end{align*}

ok the direction is actually in the Q4 but $\arctan{\left[\frac{-6.4}{-9.8}\right]}$
is in Q1! Do we just add $180^o$ for that or is it $-33.15^o$

The direction would be in quadrant III, and so recognizing that both components are negative, you would in fact add $\pi$ to the angle:

$$\theta=\pi+\arctan\left(\frac{v_y}{v_x}\right)$$

karush said:
Also is there symbols for magnitude and direction other than an arrow on the graph

Also where is the latex for degree instead of ^o

I use ^{\circ} for the degree symbol.
 
MarkFL said:
The direction would be in quadrant III, and so recognizing that both components are negative, you would in fact add $\pi$ to the angle:

$$\theta=\pi+\arctan\left(\frac{v_y}{v_x}\right)$$

$\textsf{ok so it}$ $$33.15^\circ + 180^\circ = 213.15^\circ $$
that would place it Q3

MarkFL said:
I use ^{\circ} for the degree symbol.

actually why don't we have \degree on the Symbol/Command Set:
 
It was an oversight I suppose, but adding it now would require a lot of effort. :)
 
I completely understand:cool:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top