The discussion centers on the 1919 observations related to Eddington's measurements of light deflection during a solar eclipse, specifically examining the experimental margin of error and its implications for distinguishing between Newtonian and Einsteinian predictions. The scope includes historical analysis and the reliability of early experimental methods in the context of relativity.
Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the experimental margin of error and its impact on the acceptance of Eddington's results. There is no consensus on whether the margin of error was significant enough to prevent discrimination between the two theories.
Limitations include the historical context of experimental error reporting and the potential influence of Eddington's prestige on the acceptance of the results, which may affect interpretations of the data.
Probably. But, it gave the newspapers a great headline!Jedothek said:But what I want to know is: was the experimental margin of error so large as to prevent discrimination between Newton and Einstein?
And I think it's fair to say that Eddington's prestige precluded any real review of the results at the time. They were just accepted.PeroK said:Probably. But, it gave the newspapers a great headline!