Effect of radiation on microcircuits/chips

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the challenges posed by smaller transistors with higher density in both terrestrial and space systems, particularly regarding sensitivity to ionizing radiation. This radiation can cause single event upset (SEU) errors, where a bit flips from 1 to 0 without damaging the transistor, leading to data integrity issues in microprocessors used in space missions. The paper referenced suggests that similar problems may arise in advanced technologies like superconducting qubits as processor sizes increase. While astronomers have developed techniques to mitigate these issues in imaging hardware, their applicability to quantum processing remains uncertain. The conversation also touches on historical advancements in radiation-hardened CPUs, such as silicon on sapphire chips from the 1970s, and mentions the RAD750 chip, which is still in use for its radiation tolerance. Overall, the need for innovative solutions to address radiation effects in modern computing systems is emphasized.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
Going to smaller transistors with higher density increases sensitivity. This an issue in terrestrial systems as much as it is an issue in space.

I've of issues with microprocessors in space having data issues, or chips like P5-133 having to be reset.

Here are some interesting stories.

Ionizing radiation may cause a single event upset (SEU) error, a type of soft error that doesn't damage the transistor, but does cause a 1 to flip to 0.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes Tom.G
Computer science news on Phys.org
https://arstechnica.com/science/202...swamp-error-correction-on-quantum-processors/
So, this is a problem for transmons, and the paper suggests that similar issues could affect other leading technologies. And it's only going to get worse as we build bigger processors in order to boost qubit counts. Can anything be done?

Unfortunately, the paper's authors have to turn to hypotheticals here. They note that astronomers have faced similar problems in designing their imaging hardware and have come up with ways of altering the physical structure of their detector in order to limit the spread of phonons. But it's not clear whether the techniques used there are compatible with quantum processing hardware. But the paper seemingly gives people a very good reason to find out.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01432-8

Resolving catastrophic error bursts from cosmic rays in large arrays of superconducting qubits
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
Yeah it seems that we may need to recalc something n times and take the answer as the most prominate one as is done in quantum computing for these types of environments.
 
We have a fix.
low_background_metal.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, berkeman and FactChecker
I'm not sure how they design hardened CPUs these days, but there were a few silicon on sapphire chips in the mid 1970's like RCA's CDP 1802 that were more resistant to radiation (and electrostatic discharge). Low volume and expensive, they were intended for space missions, though it's been a while so I can't recall whether their transistors would still flip 1 to 0 like the OP describes when struck by ionizing radiation.
 
There are several effects, e.g., soft errors in which transistors are flipped but not damaged, and hard errors where damage occurs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-event_upset

There is a discussion of bit flips, SEEs and causes in the summaries at
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/single-event-upset

"Radiation Effects in Electronic Materials and Devices" in right column has a figure showing bit flips from 0 to 1 and 1 to 0 in a CMOS (see figure with "Effect on Logic").

I remember the development of the RAD750.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD750
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD5500
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RAD6000

Edit/update: https://indico.cern.ch/event/649606.../2401425/introduction-short-Oct1-Gaillard.pdf
 
Last edited:
In this video (t=19:28) by Veritasium, he says that modern space missions such as Perseverance are still using the PowerPC chip from 2001 because it is more radiation tolerant.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top