Effect of Sun movement on Planetary orbits?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the effects of the sun's movement around the galactic center on planetary orbits, including theoretical implications and gravitational influences. It encompasses concepts from astrophysics, including galactic tides, velocity profiles, and mass distribution within the galaxy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the sun's motion around the galactic center adds motion to the planets, indicating that the solar system moves as a unit.
  • Others introduce the concept of galactic tides, noting that the gravitational pull on the solar system varies depending on its orientation relative to the galactic center, though they argue the effect is negligible at the distance of the planets.
  • One participant mentions that the Oort Cloud's shape may be influenced by the galactic tide, potentially leading to a non-spherical distribution.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the galactic gravitational field, with some participants arguing that it cannot be treated as a simple central mass due to the complex distribution of mass in the galaxy.
  • Participants debate the implications of the flat rotation curve of the Milky Way, with differing views on how mass distribution affects orbital velocities of stars and planets at varying distances from the galactic center.
  • One participant questions whether stars and planets rotate at the same angular velocity, leading to further clarification about the behavior of stars in barred spiral galaxies versus those in a flat rotation profile.
  • There is a correction regarding the assumptions made about mass distribution and its effects on velocity profiles, with participants discussing the implications of using different models for circular velocity in both the solar system and the galaxy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of the sun's movement and the nature of gravitational influences within the galaxy. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications of galactic tides and velocity profiles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about mass distribution and the effects of galactic tides, which are not fully resolved. The discussion also highlights the complexity of modeling gravitational influences in a galaxy compared to a solar system.

OSalcido
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
What is the effect (if any) of the sun's movement around the galactic center in relation to planetary orbits?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The planetary orbits are computed relative to the sun. The motion of the sun within the galaxy translates into an added motion of all the planets within the galaxy. In other words, the entire solar system moves as a unit.
 
There is something called the galactic tide. The side of the solar system facing the galactic center is pulled harder than the side facing away. At the distance of the planets, its negligable and can be ignored. It won't cause more than a few meters of difference in the postions of the planets. But at greater distances, it makes a difference. The Oort Cloud is probably not spherical due to the galactic tide. The Sun's Hill Sphere is limited to about 1-2 light years due to the pull from the galactic center. So the Oort Cloud is probably more of a football (American) shape.
 
We also have to remember the galactic gravitational field is not that of a central mass with negligible mass test particles orbiting it, but the gravitating mass itself is in orbit, they are the stars and gas of the galactic disk, together with a massive dark halo in which the galaxy is situated, which gives it a flat orbiting velocity/radius profile.

It would be interesting to be able to observe how the galactic tide does perturb the Oort cloud.

Garth
 
If I recall correctly, the galactic center can be approximated by a point mass containing all the mass of the galaxy interior to your position. Everything beyond you cancels out. I believe this is the reason for the flat velocity profile.
 
Not true, such a scenario would produce a
[tex]V(r) \propto \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}[/tex] velocity profile.

The Milky Way's rotation curve may be modeled in a first approximation by a density distribution of DM

[tex]\rho(r) = \frac{C}{(a^2 + r^2)}[/tex]

A more detailed treatment may be found in this eprint published today Disk galaxy rotation curves and dark matter distribution.

Garth
 
Last edited:
May i ask if all the stars and planets in the Galaxy rotate at the same angular velocity or the ones closer to the centre will have higher angular velocity?
 
haiha said:
May i ask if all the stars and planets in the Galaxy rotate at the same angular velocity or the ones closer to the centre will have higher angular velocity?
In general over a range in which the velocity profile is 'flat' the further out stars orbit with less angular velocity around the galactic centre.

In a barred spiral the stars of the bar all rotate at the same angular velocity and the velocity profile linearly increases with distance from the centre.

Garth
 
Garth said:
Not true, such a scenario would produce a
[tex]V(r) \propto \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}[/tex] velocity profile.

This formula works well for the solar system, where ~99.8% of the solar system's mass is contained in the Sun. However, for a galaxy, the mass interior to your position, as you move outward, does not stay constant, so we can't simplify it with a 1. Starting with the formula for circular velocity, [tex]v(r)= \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}[/tex], G stays constant, so it can be simplified to [tex]v(r)\propto \sqrt{\frac{M}{r}}[/tex]. Unlike our solar system, as you move away from the center of the galaxy, the mass of the galaxy interior to your position significantly increases.

Even for our solar system, if you want an exact answer for an object's circular orbital velocity, using [tex]v(r)= \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}[/tex], you must add the masses of all the planets interior to it to the mass of the sun. This is especially true for Kuiper Belt objects, where your answers will be off by more than 2 meters/second if you use only the Sun's mass.

See question 3 on this page: http://corelli.sdsu.edu/courses/astro101_fall2006/readingquiz/Reading13_quiz.pdf
 
  • #10
Okay, my error, I didn't read your "interior to your position" in the phrase "the galactic center can be approximated by a point mass containing all the mass of the galaxy interior to your position. "

For your explanation to hold good it means that for a flat rotation velocity profile
[tex]M(r) \propto r[/tex]

This requires: If the mass is in a flat disc

[tex]\rho (r) \propto \frac{1}{r}[/tex]

and if the mass is distributed spherically

[tex]\rho (r) \propto \frac{1}{r^2}[/tex],

Garth
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K