Effective way of slurry sampling

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on achieving representative slurry sampling in a reactor with a 4 PBT + 4 PBT agitator operating at 94 RPM. Users express concerns about significant deviations in analysis results from two samples taken simultaneously from the reactor's bottom. Key insights include the importance of ensuring the agitator effectively mixes the entire volume and the need for advanced sampling techniques to mitigate concentration variations. It is established that sampling from different points is limited due to safety concerns, and variations in slurry concentration can arise from inadequate mixing or settling in the sampling system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of slurry dynamics and behavior
  • Familiarity with agitator design and mixing principles
  • Knowledge of sampling techniques in chemical processes
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics related to settling velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced slurry sampling techniques, such as in-line sampling systems
  • Explore agitator sizing for complete mixing versus off-bottom suspension
  • Investigate the impact of tank geometry and baffles on mixing efficiency
  • Learn about the effects of particle size and type on settling behavior in slurries
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, process engineers, and quality control specialists involved in slurry processing and sampling methodologies.

Rachit
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have ~50% slurry mass in a reactor with (4 PBT + 4PBT) agitator. Agitator is rotating at 94 RPM.
To analyze reaction mass we are sending two samples at a time from bottom of the reactor. There is significant analysis deviations in these two samples. I feel that the sample is not representative of the reaction mass.
Is there any way to get representative sample in slurry mass or any advanced sampling technique that can help?
Also is there any calculation/ relations to check if sample is representative of the slurry mass or not?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome, Rachit! :cool:

Are the agitators effectively reaching and moving the whole volume contained in the tank?
If not reaching the bottom, could you stop the rotating parts and take samples from a higher and mid-radius point?
Can you precisely calculate the original mass of pure water in the mix?

Just a few ideas.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rachit
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, Rachit! :cool:

Are the agitators effectively reaching and moving the whole volume contained in the tank?
If not reaching the bottom, could you stop the rotating parts and take samples from a higher and mid-radius point?
Can you precisely calculate the original mass of pure water in the mix?

Just a few ideas.
You can say that the agitator reaches upto 96% of the reactor height( or depth).

Sampling from different points of the mix is not possible due to safety concerns.

The original mass of pure water is known (precisely).

Now, is there any correlation or formula to check settling velocity in a pipe placed at an angle from vertical
 
There are so many variables involved in slurry settling that formulas are impractical. For example, precipitated calcium carbonate settles completely differently than ground calcium carbonate with the same particle size. A lesson that a certain agitator manufacturer learned the hard (expensive) way.

An agitator sized for complete mixing is more powerful than an agitator sized for off bottom suspension. If your agitation system (agitator, impeller, tank shape, baffles) is sized for anything less than complete mixing, there will be variations in concentration. Those variations would show as concentration differences between successive samples.

Does your sample system allow the slurry to settle in the pipe immediately before the sample valve? If so, are you letting it flow before capturing the sample?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Rachit, Astronuc, Lnewqban and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
850
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K