Efficient MCNP Lattice Source Help: Defining Universes and Tallies in Cell File

Click For Summary
The discussion highlights frustrations with the lack of documentation in MCNP, particularly regarding defining a universe as a source and tally. A user encountered a "sampling efficiency is too low" error while attempting to set up tallies for specific positions in a lattice and a source for certain elements. After adjusting the efficiency to 1E-10, they faced a new error related to lost particles in a lattice element. Suggestions included checking alignment issues in the lattice and reconsidering the source definition, emphasizing that a very low efficiency indicates a potential misconfiguration. Proper alignment and correct source placement are crucial for resolving these issues.
ethnscot
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
This is what I hate about MCNP, not a lot of documentation. How do I define all of a universe as a source and a tally? I have a lattice like the below code.
How do I get this code to work with tallies for positions 1,2, and 3 in the lattice; and a source for the 2's. I get the error "sampling efficiency is too low" Since, I have a very, very low efficiency I'm not sure how to fix this.
[CODE title="One That Doesn't Work"]MCNP Cell File
c Created on
901 0 999 imp:p=0 imp:e=0
902 6 -0.001205 -999 901 imp:p=0 imp:e=0
903 0 -902 u=999 lat=1 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
fill=0:2 0:8 0:4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
904 0 -901 fill=999 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
42 0 -903 u=1 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
43 0 903 u=1 imp:p=0 imp:e=0
1 2 -0.997 -903 u=2 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
101 0 903 u=2 imp:p=0 imp:e=0
2 2 -0.997 -903 u=3 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
102 0 903 u=3 imp:p=0 imp:e=0
3 6 -0.001205 -903 u=4 imp:p=1 imp:e=1
103 0 903 u=4 imp:p=0 imp:e=0

901 rpp 0 71 0 167 0 119
902 rpp -10.0 10.0 -10.0 10.0 -10.0 10.0
903 rpp -10.1 10.1 -10.1 10.1 -10.1 10.1
999 rpp -5 76 -5 172 -5 124

c water
m2 1000 -0.111902
8000 -0.888098
c Air
m6 6000 -0.000124
7000 -0.755268
8000 -0.231781
18000 -0.012827
mode p e
sdef erg=1 par=2 eff=0.0000001 X=d1 Y=d2 Z=d3 cel=d4
si1 -10.0 10.0
sp1 0 1
si2 -10.0 10.0
sp2 0 1
si3 -10.0 10.0
sp3 0 1
si4 L (3<903<904)
sp4 1
f8:e (2<903<904)
e8 0 0.0000001 5.0
f18:e (2<903<904)
e18 0 0.0000001 5.0
nps 1000000[/CODE]
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I actually figured it out myself. I needed eff to be 1E-10. Now I have ***** lost particle in newcel - zero lattice element hit ***** as an error. Does anyone know how to fix this?
 
Your x and z are misaligned so you get empty lattice hits. Run mcnp ip Input.txt and do some cross sections through the lattice to see. 'px 1' is helpful.

If you are setting an eff so low you are wasting 99.99% of your computer time that should be a hint something is not right. You seem to want to define your source in one of the other universes, this makes no sense to me. When you have fixed the alignment, locate the position in the real universe and redo the source and I would expect many problems to go away.
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K