Efficiently Solve PDE Systems: Expert Tips and Solutions | Help Needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of partial differential equations (PDEs), with participants exploring potential solutions and conditions for the functions involved. The focus includes the validity of simplifications, the nature of solutions, and specific requirements related to holomorphic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a PDE and expresses uncertainty about the generality of their solution, noting a triviality condition for coefficients.
  • Another participant questions the validity of a simplification of the original equation and proposes a derived relationship between the functions involved.
  • A subsequent reply indicates a need for the functions to depend solely on one variable, citing the requirement for holomorphicity.
  • Further discussion suggests making a function constant to address the dependency issue, but another participant raises a concern about the resulting x-dependence from the simplification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of simplifications and the nature of the solutions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight specific conditions related to holomorphic functions and the implications of variable dependencies, but these aspects remain unresolved in the context of the discussion.

L0r3n20
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Hi all! I'm stuck with a system of PDE. I'm not sure I want to write it here in full, so l'll write just one of them. I've found a solution to this equation but I'm not sure it's the most general one since when I plug this solution into the other eqs, I get a trivility condition for the coefficients
2\bar{k}^1\left(\bar{s},\bar{t},\bar{u}\right)-2 k^1\left(s,t,u\right)+\left(s-\bar{s}\right)\left(\partial_s k^1\left(s,t,u\right) + \bar{\partial}_{\bar{s}}\bar{k}^1\left(\bar{s}, \bar{t}, \bar{u}\right)\right) =0
Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure I've understood the equation. Is this simplification valid:
2u(x) - 2v(y) + (y-x)(∂v/∂y + ∂u/∂x) = 0
?
If so:
∂v/∂y + ∂u/∂x = 2(u-v)/(x-y)
Consider (u, v+v') is also a solution. So
∂v'/∂y = 2v'/(y-x)
v' = (y-x)2f(x)
where f is an arbitrary function of x.
Does that help?
 
Thank you for the answer. Ok that was useful, at least a bit. In fact, although it is correct, I need a u and a v depending ONLY from one of the two variables (x and y). In fact I'm dealing with (anti)holomorphic functions and I need them to respect the holomorphicity condition.
 
L0r3n20 said:
Thank you for the answer. Ok that was useful, at least a bit. In fact, although it is correct, I need a u and a v depending ONLY from one of the two variables (x and y). In fact I'm dealing with (anti)holomorphic functions and I need them to respect the holomorphicity condition.
OK, so make f(x) constant. You can do likewise for (u+u', v).
 
Even thought I set f(x) constant I get the x-dependence from y-x, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K