EFSA-approved GMO cause hepatoreneal toxicity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gil-galad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause Toxicity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences that investigates the effects of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), specifically MON 863 and NK603, on rodents. The study indicates potential hepatorenal toxicity, raising concerns about the health risks these GMOs may pose to humans and other mammals. Participants debate the validity of the study's statistical analysis and the need for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to reassess the health implications of these GMOs based on the findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of GMO terminology and implications
  • Familiarity with statistical analysis in biological research
  • Knowledge of experimental design principles
  • Awareness of EFSA regulations and guidelines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the statistical methods used in biological studies, focusing on hypothesis testing
  • Examine the EFSA's protocols for GMO safety assessments
  • Investigate the specific health impacts of MON 863 and NK603 on mammalian physiology
  • Explore experimental design techniques to ensure consistency in dietary studies
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in the fields of genetics, toxicology, and food safety, as well as regulatory professionals and health advocates concerned with the implications of GMO consumption.

Gil-galad
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here I found a scientific article in the International Journal of Biological Sciences concerning a study on rodents fed with genetically modified organisms. Two of the GMOs, MON 863 and NK603, are approved by the European Food Safety Authority. Here are the links:
http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm
http://www.gmo-compass.org/pdf/regulation/maize/MON863xNK603_maize_opinion_efsa.pdf

Since I am not an expert I would like some help understanding the experiments and conclusions reached in the scientific article, where it states that MON 863 and NK603 GMO can cause problems in rodents, especially in kidney and liver organs. Does this mean that the EFSA should re-examine the health risk involved in humans and other mammals ? Thanks for your opinions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Gil-galad said:
Here I found a scientific article in the International Journal of Biological Sciences concerning a study on rodents fed with genetically modified organisms...

Since I am not an expert I would like some help understanding the experiments and conclusions reached in the scientific article, where it states that MON 863 and NK603 GMO can cause problems in rodents, especially in kidney and liver organs. Does this mean that the EFSA should re-examine the health risk involved in humans and other mammals ? Thanks for your opinions.

There is a huge difference between worth publishing and worth worrying about. The one paper I looked at may be in the first group, but it is not in the second. I'm a statistician not a biologist, so I looked mostly at the statistics. The first report repeats a very common, I won't call it a mistake but a practice by non-statisticians. Statisticians know that the power of a test only applies when your experimental design agrees with the assumptions of the power analysis. In this case, the researchers recorded lots of data, and their analysis shows that about 5% of their measurements are significant at the 5% level. Oops! From a statistical standpoint, that means you need to create a formal hypothesis, and collect new data to accept or refute that hypothesis.

In theory the authors of the first study can leave that to others to do. In practice, there is little here worth worrying about. If you feed rats different diets, and the chemicals in their urine are different, should you be surprised? I'm not.

The differences based on sex could be significant, but when you look at the experimental design, they didn't insure that male rats had identical eating habits to the female rats. That is one thing I would want to check in any follow-up tests. Are males and females eating the same proportions of the ingredients of their food mix? Are they eating at the same time relative to the lab tests? If males and females eat at different times of day, you may be back to the starting point.
 
Thanks a lot eachus, you gave me nice examples and really helped me grasp what I should be looking for in such published materials. I will take a look again at the article.