Are Eigenkets for the Creation Operator Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Creation Operator
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of eigenkets for the creation operator a† and their properties. It is established that if eigenkets exist, their overlap with the vacuum state |0⟩ is zero, implying that these eigenkets cannot correspond to non-zero eigenvalues. The participants conclude that since the overlaps with one-particle and higher states are also zero, the eigenvalue λ must be zero. Ultimately, it is clarified that there are no eigenstates of a† with non-zero eigenvalues, reinforcing the non-hermitian nature of the creation operator. This leads to the conclusion that valid eigenkets for the creation operator do not exist.
Swatch
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is to find the eigenkets for the creation operator ,a^{\dagger} if they exist

Homework Equations



a^{\dagger}|\Psi>=\lambda|\Psi>
a^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2*\hbar*m*\omega}}*(-\hbar*\frac{d}{dx}+m*\omega*x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I use the expression for the creation operator above and set up the differential equation.
The boundary conditions for the wavefunction should be that it is zero when x goes to +- infinity.
When I solve it I get this result.
0=\lambda*x\right|_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{m*\omega}{2*\hbar}}*x^{2} \right|_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

I know the creation operator is not hermitian and it is not an observable but could this answer be correct?
Could someone please comment on this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Swatch said:

Homework Statement



The problem is to find the eigenkets for the creation operator ,a^{\dagger} if they exist

Homework Equations



a^{\dagger}|\Psi>=\lambda|\Psi>
a^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2*\hbar*m*\omega}}*(-\hbar*\frac{d}{dx}+m*\omega*x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I use the expression for the creation operator above and set up the differential equation.
The boundary conditions for the wavefunction should be that it is zero when x goes to +- infinity.
When I solve it I get this result.
0=\lambda*x\right|_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{m*\omega}{2*\hbar}}*x^{2} \right|_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

I know the creation operator is not hermitian and it is not an observable but could this answer be correct?
Could someone please comment on this

If eigenkets of a^\dagger exist. What is their overlap with the vacuum?
 
What is their overlap with vaccum?
I don't understand!
 
By "vacuum" I just mean the state |0\rangle that satisfies
<br /> a|0\rangle=0<br />

By "overlap with the vacuum" I mean, what is
<br /> \langle 0 |\lambda\rangle<br />
equal to?
 
...where |\lambda\rangle is the eigenket of a^\dagger with eigenvalue \lambda
 
The overlap with the vacuum is zero
but how does this help me?:confused:
 
Swatch said:
The overlap with the vacuum is zero
but how does this help me?:confused:

So, the overlap with the vacuum is zero. Good.

Now, what is the overlap with the "one-particle" state
<br /> |1\rangle = a^\dagger |0\rangle\;<br />
?
 
I believe the overlap of |\lambda&gt; with the one particle state to be zero
 
Swatch said:
I believe the overlap of |\lambda&gt; with the one particle state to be zero

So, given that, what's the overlap of |\lambda&gt; with the 2-particle state |2>? I hope you realize what the nth question is going to be.
 
  • #10
I think I understand this.
since the overlap of \lambda and the vacuum is zero and also the overlap with the one, two and so one particle functions is zero, \lambda must be zero.
Am I right?
 
  • #11
Swatch said:
I think I understand this.
since the overlap of \lambda and the vacuum is zero and also the overlap with the one, two and so one particle functions is zero, \lambda must be zero.
Am I right?

The notation you are using above confuses the state with it's eigenvalue.

What we have just seen is that if the *eigenvalue* \lambda is non-zero then the *state* |\lambda&gt; must be zero--i.e., there are no eigenstate of a^\dagger with non-zero eigenvalues.
 
  • #12
Thank you all for your help:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K