Eigenstate and real space representation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of eigenstate representation for transverse direction Hamiltonians (HT) and real space representation for longitudinal direction Hamiltonians (HL) in quantum simulations. The Hamiltonians are defined as HL = h²/2m * d²/dx² + U and HT = h²/2m * (d²/dy² + d²/dz²) + U(y,z). The participants clarify that the wave function representation changes with the Hamiltonian, and that ρ corresponds to the 2D vector (y,z) in the y–z plane. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between eigenstate and real space representations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics terminology, specifically Hamiltonians.
  • Familiarity with eigenstate representation and real space representation concepts.
  • Knowledge of finite difference approximation methods in numerical simulations.
  • Basic grasp of vector mathematics, particularly in two dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics, focusing on HL and HT formulations.
  • Explore the concept of eigenstate representation in quantum simulations.
  • Learn about finite difference methods for solving differential equations in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the physical significance of wave vectors and their representations in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students involved in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on numerical simulations and Hamiltonian dynamics.

Arya_
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was going through a paper on quantum simulations. Below is an extract from the paper; I would be obliged if anyone can help me to understand it:

We will use eigenstate representation for transverse direction(HT) and real space for longitudinal direction(HL) Hamiltonians.

HL= h^2/2m * d^2/dx^2 + U (makes sense because x is longitudinal direction)

HT= h^2/2m *( d^2/dy^2 + d^2/dz^2) + Uy.z (writing in terms of y,z isn't a real space representation again? This was meant to be eigenstate representaion)

then,

Xk(ρ) = exp(i.k.ρ)/area
where HT.Xk = εk.Xk

k and ρ are both 2D vectors.

Now, k is wave vector, Xk(ρ) is function of ρ, what is ρ? What does it physically corresponds to?

Using finite difference approximation for HL:

HLψ= -tψn-1 +2t+Un.ψn +...

here I can interpret ψ is function of n, which is discretized real space. However I am not able to figure out what is ρ?

Thanks,
Arya
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was able to find the article by Googling. Posting a reference would have been helpful. It seems to be written by someone that has little experience in quantum mechanical numerical simulations and uses a very non-standard notation.

Arya_ said:
HL= h^2/2m * d^2/dx^2 + U (makes sense because x is longitudinal direction)

HT= h^2/2m *( d^2/dy^2 + d^2/dz^2) + Uy.z (writing in terms of y,z isn't a real space representation again? This was meant to be eigenstate representaion)
The Hamiltonian doesn't change because of the representation, the wave function (or rather, its representation) does. The wave function is sampled on a series of grid points ##x_n## along with a finite basis of eigenfunctions ##\chi_\mathbf{k}(y,z)##.

Arya_ said:
k and ρ are both 2D vectors.
You truncated the quotation: "both 2D vectors in the y–z plane." I take it that ##\rho = (y,z)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K