Eigenvalue of overlapping block matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the eigenvalues of a specific overlapping block matrix, which is rank 3, indicating that all but three eigenvalues are zero. The matrix's structure allows for the use of block methods to derive eigenvectors and eigenvalues. Eigenvectors can be constructed using combinations of rows with specific patterns of ones and zeros. Participants are encouraged to identify the mathematical classification of such matrices for further research. The conversation highlights the analytical approach to understanding eigenvalues in large matrices with similar structures.
eegyan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have got a problem in my research. For the following matrix,
a a a a a a b b b b
a a a a a a b b b b
a a a a a a b b b b
a a a a a a b b b b
a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a
b b b b a a a a a a
b b b b a a a a a a
b b b b a a a a a a
b b b b a a a a a a,
does anyone know how to obtain its eigenvalues analytically when the matrix size goes large? Is there any "name" for matrices just like this in mathmatics? I want to search for some inspiration in mathematics matrix community, but I even do not know what it is called in mathmatics. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the matrix is rank 3, so all but three of the eigenvalues are zero. We can use the block structure to find the eigenvectors, and hence the eigenvalues.

If there are x, y and z of each type of row, a vector with x ones then all zeros is an eigenvector, as is a vector with x zeros, y ones then z zeros, and so is a vector with x+y zeros followed by z ones
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
979
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
858
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K