Eigenvalue problem and initial-value problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the eigenvalue problem (EVP) and the initial value problem (IVP) in the context of linear equations governed by the operator \(\mathcal{L}\), which is influenced by parameters such as the Reynolds number. When the eigenvalue is positive, indicating system instability, the initial condition will amplify over time, particularly in the early phases. The solution will asymptotically converge to the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue, as the most unstable mode grows fastest. Participants emphasized the importance of observing the system over a sufficiently long time to accurately assess energy dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalue problems (EVP) in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with initial value problems (IVP) in differential equations
  • Knowledge of stability analysis in dynamical systems
  • Basic concepts of numerical methods for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of positive eigenvalues on system stability
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving initial value problems (IVP)
  • Explore the relationship between eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear systems
  • Investigate the effects of perturbations on dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in applied mathematics, engineers working with dynamical systems, and anyone involved in stability analysis of linear differential equations.

jollage
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I want to ask a question about the eigenvalue problem (EVP) and the initial value problem (IVP).

Let's say we are solving this linear equation \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=\mathcal{L}u, the operator L is dependent on some parameters like Reynolds number.
I first check the eigenvalue of the equation at a specific parameter set.

My question is if the eigenvalue at this specific parameter is positive (meaning the system is unstable), now I solved the IVP counterpart \frac{u^{n+1}-u^n}{dt}=\mathcal{L}u with an ARBITRARY initial condition, will this initial condition amplifies over all the time history (especially at the early phase, because I know asymptotically the system is governed by the positive eigenvalue)?

Thanks in advance

Jo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jollage said:
Hi all,

I want to ask a question about the eigenvalue problem (EVP) and the initial value problem (IVP).

Let's say we are solving this linear equation \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=\mathcal{L}u, the operator L is dependent on some parameters like Reynolds number.
I first check the eigenvalue of the equation at a specific parameter set.

My question is if the eigenvalue at this specific parameter is positive (meaning the system is unstable), now I solved the IVP counterpart \frac{u^{n+1}-u^n}{dt}=\mathcal{L}u with an ARBITRARY initial condition, will this initial condition amplifies over all the time history (especially at the early phase, because I know asymptotically the system is governed by the positive eigenvalue)?

Thanks in advance

Jo

Assuming that you're initial perturbation is sufficiently random, it will kick off all the unstable modes of the system. However the most unstable mode will grow fastest and overtime it will dominate the solution.
Thus the procedure you describe will asymptotically yield the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue.
Does that make sense?
 
the_wolfman said:
Assuming that you're initial perturbation is sufficiently random, it will kick off all the unstable modes of the system. However the most unstable mode will grow fastest and overtime it will dominate the solution.
Thus the procedure you describe will asymptotically yield the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue.
Does that make sense?

Hi the_wolfman,

I have figured out what's going on here.

I have originally many negative eigenvalues and one positive eigenvalues, so initially the energy of the state should decay before asymptotically increase. Previously, I failed to look at a sufficiently long time (I observe the energy "always" decays), so I thought I did something in the numerics. Now I fixed it, what I have to do is to run a very long time before I would see the decay of the energy.

Thank you anyway.

Jo
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K