Eigenvalues And Eigenvectors Problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on key concepts related to eigenvalues and eigenvectors, specifically addressing the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, which states that every matrix is a root of its characteristic polynomial, Pa(A)=0. Participants also explore the relationship between the eigenvalues of products of matrices, demonstrating that AB and BA share the same eigenvalues. Furthermore, it is established that a linear mapping U is singular if and only if 0 is an eigenvalue of U. Lastly, the discussion touches on the implications of eigenvalues when considering the inverse of a matrix, particularly in relation to stretching vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of linear mappings and matrix singularity
  • Basic concepts of determinants and characteristic polynomials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem using the Lagrange determinant formula
  • Learn about the relationship between eigenvalues of a matrix and its inverse
  • Explore the implications of singular matrices in linear algebra
  • Investigate the properties of characteristic polynomials in matrix theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, matrix theory, and eigenvalue problems. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of matrix properties and their applications in various fields.

kthouz
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
1. How to show (prove) the Cayley-Hamilton theorem :
“Every matrix is a zero of its characteristic polynomial , Pa(A)=0”.
2. A and B are n-square matrices, show that AB and BA have the same eigenvalues.
3. Show that to say that “ 0is an eigenvalue of linear mapping U” is equivalent to “ U is singular”.
4. Compare eigenvalues of U and eigenvalues of U[upperscript]-1[/upperscript].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you know about determinants,i thinkyou can see AB and BA have the same characteristic polynomial. If U stretches a vector by 2, what does Uinverse do to that vector?

If you even know the definition of the words you can show that 0 beiung an eigenvalue is the same as being singular.

the cayley hamilton theorem is tricky but the shortest proof i know is the lagrange determinant formula that implies that if A is a square matrix and adA is itsclassical adjoint, i.e. transpose of matrix of alternating subdeterminants,

then [X-A][ad(X-A] = det(X-A).Id. (Cramers rule).

Then since X-A divides the characteristic polynomial in the ring of matrices with polynomial entries, it also does so in the ring of polynomials with matrix coefficients, so by the non commutative root factor theorem, A is a root.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K