Eigenvalues for a matrix with equal and opposite diagonal entries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlphaNumeric2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Matrix
Click For Summary
For a square matrix with diagonal entries 'a' and '-a', it is established that the matrix cannot be positive or negative definite, as it will have eigenvalues with opposite signs or both zero. The characteristic polynomial can be derived as P(x) = (x^2 - a^2) + bc, leading to insights about the eigenvalues. The trace of the matrix, which is the sum of the eigenvalues, will also reflect this property. Exploring 2x2 matrices with these diagonal entries can provide clarity on the behavior of the eigenvalues. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the relationship between the diagonal entries and the nature of the eigenvalues.
AlphaNumeric2
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
Given a square matrix (arbitrary finite size) where two diagonal entries are 'a' and '-a', what can you derive about the eigenvalues of the matrix?

My supervisor mentioned she'd read something about it being provable that the matrix cannot be positive or negative definite. Two of the eigenvalues will certainly have opposite signs or at most be both zero. She says she read it on a book but has completely forgotten where or what the result's name was (if it has one).

Can anyone confirm this result? The square matrix is completely general except for two diagonal entries being the negative of one another. I'm not sure if they had to be successive diagonal entries. If it is true, what's the proof? If it's too long a proof or requires a bunch of lemma to build up to it from more well known results, can someone point me to a book or website which covers it?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered writing down 2x2 matrices with diagonal entries 1 and -1 and playing around with things? It is very illuminating, and should have been the first thing you did.
 
well obviously the charectaristic polynomial will be: P(x)=(x^2-a^2)+bc=x^2+(bc-a^2) but it seems to be triviality thing to check is it not?
 
so what's the trace?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K