Eigenvaules and quantum numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between eigenvalues, quantum numbers, and the Schrödinger equation, particularly in the context of the hydrogen atom and its degeneracies. Participants explore the implications of rotational invariance, the role of various operators, and the significance of different potentials in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the eigenvalues of certain operators correspond to the quantum numbers of a system, questioning which operators are relevant.
  • Others explain that the Hamiltonian is rotationally invariant and commutes with the components of orbital angular momentum, leading to eigenfunctions labeled by quantum numbers.
  • It is noted that the radial equation results in a radial wave function influenced by an angular momentum term, yet the eigenvalues ultimately depend only on the principal quantum number n.
  • Participants discuss various observables that can have countable spectral values, including energy, spin, and angular momentum, and the implications of degeneracies in energy levels due to symmetry generators.
  • Some mention the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector as an additional conserved quantity in the Kepler problem, contributing to the l-degeneracy of hydrogen atom energies.
  • There is a conjecture regarding the conditions under which l-degeneracy occurs for different potentials, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the deeper reasons behind these observations.
  • A later reply emphasizes the separability of the Schrödinger equation in different coordinate systems for specific potentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of quantum numbers and degeneracies, with some points of agreement on the role of symmetry and potential forms, but no consensus is reached on the deeper reasons behind these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves complex mathematical and physical concepts, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of certain symmetries and their effects on quantum states.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring the relationship between symmetry, quantum numbers, and eigenvalues in various potentials.

khemist
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
Eigenvalues and quantum numbers

My professor was discussing the Schrödinger equation in 3-d today and mentioned that there are degeneracies within quantum numbers (for the hydrogen atom, the x, y, and z components are symmetric?). Does that imply that the eigenvalues of some operator are the quantum numbers of a system? If so, which operator is it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Studying the Hamiltonian H you see that it is rotationally invariant, i.e. it commutes with all components of orbital angular momentum Li acting as generators of rotations:

[H,Li] = 0

H contains an angular momentum term, namely ~L²/r² which is the familiar additional term in the effective potential (already present in the Kepler problem).

Studying L² and Lz you get eigenfunctions, the so called spherical harmonics Ylm; they are labels by two quantum numbers l and m:

L² Ylm = l(l+1) Ylm

Lz Ylm = m Ylm

The radial part of H is responsible for the quantum number n, so in total the states are labelled as |nlm> with n=1,2,..., l=0,1,...,n-1, m=-l, ...,l-1, l

It's interesting (and I have to admit that I do not understand if there is some deeper reason!) that
a) the radial equation results in a radial wave funtion Rnl(r) where l is due to the additional term in the effective potential ~L²/r² ~ l(l+1)/r², but
b) the eigenvalues Enl do in the very end not depend on l, i.e. are labelled as En ~ 1/n²

So in total you have

H |nlm> = En |nlm>
L² |nlm> = l(l+1) |nlm>
Lz |nlm> = m |nlm>
 
What are the so-called <quantum numbers> ? Eigenvalues of operators describing observables. So what are these observables which could have a countable number of spectral values ? Energy for once, then spin, then orbital angular momentum, then total angular momentum, then electric charge, then barionic charge, parity, etc.

So for a conserved observable, (its operator, assumed time-independent in the Schrödinger picture) there's always a degeneracy of the discrete energy levels, since each closed subspace associated with an energy value is reduced by the symmetry generator, for example L2 for the spherically-symmetric potentials (free particle in 3D, isotropic oscillator in 3D, H-atom/hydrogenoid ions).
 
tom.stoer said:
a) the radial equation results in a radial wave funtion Rnl(r) where l is due to the additional term in the effective potential ~L²/r² ~ l(l+1)/r², but
b) the eigenvalues Enl do in the very end not depend on l, i.e. are labelled as En ~ 1/n²
There's an additional conserved quantity in the Kepler problem -the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector- which is due to a subtle SO(4) symmetry of the potential. This leads to the l-degeneracy of the hydrogen atom energies.
 
kith said:
There's an additional conserved quantity in the Kepler problem -the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector- which is due to a subtle SO(4) symmetry of the potential. This leads to the l-degeneracy of the hydrogen atom energies.
This was my conjecture, but I wasn't sure about it.

That means that for V(r)~1/r with its SO(4) symmetry in dim=3 and for V(r)~r² with its SU(N) symmetry in dim=N we have l-degeneracy, but for no other V(r)~rz (for different z-values). For the harmonic oscillator in dim=N it's trivial to prove SU(N) symmetry and degeneracy, for the hydrogen atom it's more involved.
 
This was much more in depth than I intended. Thanks for the info. When does this sort of material get introduced in a physics major?
 
Depends on the curriculum the teacher has prepared for his QM class. You may also get a separate group theory course where applications of group theory to quantum mechanics are presented.
 
I didn't hear about this in lectures but stumbled upon it by studying symmetry operators for an oral exam. I think that most lecturers don't want to spend half the QM course on the hydrogen atom. ;-)
 
tom.stoer said:
This was my conjecture, but I wasn't sure about it.

That means that for V(r)~1/r with its SO(4) symmetry in dim=3 and for V(r)~r² with its SU(N) symmetry in dim=N we have l-degeneracy, but for no other V(r)~rz (for different z-values). For the harmonic oscillator in dim=N it's trivial to prove SU(N) symmetry and degeneracy, for the hydrogen atom it's more involved.

Correct. This is also responsible for the fact that the Schrödinger equation is separable in two coordinate systems for those two potentials: spherical coordinates, and rectangulars for the harmonic oscillator and parabolic for the Coulomb potential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
561
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K