Eigenvector Woes Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter kq6up
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvectors of a given 3x3 matrix. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue λ=3, particularly questioning why it is identified as along the direction of the unit vector \(\hat{j}\).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the eigenvectors for the eigenvalues and questions the result for λ=3, specifically the implications of the resulting equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the original poster's confusion, with some clarifying the implications of the matrix rows and the resulting equations. There is an acknowledgment of the lack of constraints on one variable, which may contribute to the misunderstanding.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the interpretation of the equations derived from the eigenvalue problem, particularly regarding the implications of zeroing out certain variables and the resulting freedom in others.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvectors of: ##
\newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}\left(\begin{array}{rrr}

5 & 0 & \sqrt{3} \\

0 & 3 & 0 \\

\sqrt{3} & 0 & 3

\end{array}\right)

##

Homework Equations



##(\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I})\cdot\mathbf{x}=0##

The Attempt at a Solution



I get the correct eigenvectors for ##\lambda=2,6##, but I don't understand why the eigenvector is ##\hat{j}## when ##\lambda=3##.

When ##\lambda=3##, the matrix becomes ##
\newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}\left(\begin{array}{rrr}

2 & 0 & \sqrt{3} \\

0 & 0 & 0 \\

\sqrt{3} & 0 & 0

\end{array}\right)

##. The first row yields a function ##2x-\sqrt{3}z=0##. The points that satisfy this equation do not lay along ##\hat{j}##. What am I missing?

Thanks,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The third row implies ##x=0##. Do you see that?
 
kq6up said:
The first row yields a function 2x− 3√ z=0
The first row yields the equation 2x + 3 √ z=0.

As vela notes, the third row implies that x = 0. Neither equation involves y, so there are no constraints on y.
 
Ah, that makes sense.

Thanks,
Chris
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K