Eigenvectors & subspace spanning

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to eigenvectors and spanning vector spaces, specifically involving an invertible matrix P and its relationship to another matrix A. The original poster is attempting to understand the implications of an equation involving eigenvectors of the matrix PAP^{-1} compared to those of A.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion about the meaning of the equality involving eigenvectors and the interpretation of the matrices involved. They explore the relationship between the eigenvectors of A and those of PAP^{-1}, questioning their understanding of spanning and eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications regarding the nature of the matrices and the relationship between eigenvectors of A and B (where B = PAP^{-1}). There is an acknowledgment of a misunderstanding regarding the terminology of eigenvalues versus eigenvectors, and the conversation appears to be moving towards a clearer understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is grappling with the definitions and implications of eigenvectors in the context of matrix transformations, indicating a potential gap in their understanding of the underlying linear algebra concepts.

AngrySaki
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The question is at the end of a chapter on spanning vector spaces.

Homework Statement


Let P denote an invertible n x n matrix.
If [tex]\lambda[/tex] is a number, show that

[tex]E_{\lambda}(PAP^{-1}) = \left\{PX | X\;is\;in\;E_{\lambda}(A)\right\}[/tex]

for each n x n matrix A. [Here [tex]E_{\lambda}(A)}[/tex] is the set of eigenvectors of A.]

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble understanding what the equality means, or how to read it.
The left side looks to be the eigenvectors of a diagonal matrix, which I think are always the columns of an identity matrix.

On the right side, I assume the matrix P would be the eigenvectors of A, so I think it's the span of the products of P multiplied by each of it's columns.

I don't know what to make of those ideas, so I think I'm either missing something about eigenvectors or spanning (very possible), or reading the question wrong.


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix PAP-1 is diagonal if the columns of P are the eigenvectors of A, but you don't know anything about P other than it's invertible.

Let B=PAP-1. What the question is asking you to show is that the eigenvectors of B are of the form Px and that Px is an eigenvector of B, where x is an eigenvector of A.
 
Thanks, that helps a lot.

Does this makes sense as an answer?


Eigenvalues of A can be written:
[tex](\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]

So the right side of the original equation is:
[tex]P(\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]

Move the P inside:
[tex](\lambda P -PA)X=0[/tex]

Multiply by I:
[tex](\lambda P -PA)P^{-1}PX=0[/tex]

Move P inverse inside:
[tex](\lambda PP^{-1} -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]

Eigenvalues of PAP-1 are of the form PX:
[tex](\lambda I -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]
 
Except they're not eigenvalues, they're eigenvectors.
 
Oh, oops. I mean to write eigenvectors.

Just to be clear, does the method makes sense if I had written the word eigenvectors instead of eigenvalues?
 
AngrySaki said:
Thanks, that helps a lot.

Does this makes sense as an answer?


Eigenvalues of A can be written:
[tex](\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]
More correctly, "if X is an eigenvector of A, with eigenvalue [itex]\lambda[/itex], then
[tex](\lambda I- A)X= 0[/tex]"

So the right side of the original equation is:
[tex]P(\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]

Move the P inside:
[tex](\lambda P -PA)X=0[/tex]

Multiply by I:
[tex](\lambda P -PA)P^{-1}PX=0[/tex]

Move P inverse inside:
[tex](\lambda PP^{-1} -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]

Eigenvalues of PAP-1 are of the form PX:
[tex](\lambda I -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K