1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Eigenvectors & subspace spanning

  1. Jun 25, 2010 #1
    The question is at the end of a chapter on spanning vector spaces.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Let P denote an invertible n x n matrix.
    If [tex]\lambda[/tex] is a number, show that

    [tex]E_{\lambda}(PAP^{-1}) = \left\{PX | X\;is\;in\;E_{\lambda}(A)\right\}[/tex]

    for each n x n matrix A. [Here [tex]E_{\lambda}(A)}[/tex] is the set of eigenvectors of A.]

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution

    I'm having trouble understanding what the equality means, or how to read it.
    The left side looks to be the eigenvectors of a diagonal matrix, which I think are always the columns of an identity matrix.

    On the right side, I assume the matrix P would be the eigenvectors of A, so I think it's the span of the products of P multiplied by each of it's columns.

    I don't know what to make of those ideas, so I think I'm either missing something about eigenvectors or spanning (very possible), or reading the question wrong.


    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 25, 2010 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    The matrix PAP-1 is diagonal if the columns of P are the eigenvectors of A, but you don't know anything about P other than it's invertible.

    Let B=PAP-1. What the question is asking you to show is that the eigenvectors of B are of the form Px and that Px is an eigenvector of B, where x is an eigenvector of A.
     
  4. Jun 26, 2010 #3
    Thanks, that helps a lot.

    Does this makes sense as an answer?


    Eigenvalues of A can be written:
    [tex](\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]

    So the right side of the original equation is:
    [tex]P(\lambda I -A)X=0[/tex]

    Move the P inside:
    [tex](\lambda P -PA)X=0[/tex]

    Multiply by I:
    [tex](\lambda P -PA)P^{-1}PX=0[/tex]

    Move P inverse inside:
    [tex](\lambda PP^{-1} -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]

    Eigenvalues of PAP-1 are of the form PX:
    [tex](\lambda I -PAP^{-1})PX=0[/tex]
     
  5. Jun 26, 2010 #4

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Except they're not eigenvalues, they're eigenvectors.
     
  6. Jun 26, 2010 #5
    Oh, oops. I mean to write eigenvectors.

    Just to be clear, does the method makes sense if I had written the word eigenvectors instead of eigenvalues?
     
  7. Jun 26, 2010 #6

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    More correctly, "if X is an eigenvector of A, with eigenvalue [itex]\lambda[/itex], then
    [tex](\lambda I- A)X= 0[/tex]"

     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook