Einstein's Space-Time Continuum: Is Time a 4th Dimension?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein's theory posits that time is a fourth dimension, interconnected with the three spatial dimensions, forming a space-time continuum. However, while mathematically treated as a dimension, time exhibits unique physical properties, such as its unidirectional flow influenced by relative motion and gravity. Discussions highlight the distinction between timelike and spacelike dimensions, emphasizing their differing mathematical and physical characteristics. Resources like Lee Smolin's essay provide insights into modern physics' understanding of time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concepts of space-time continuum
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical dimensions (timelike vs. spacelike)
  • Awareness of the effects of gravity on time perception
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Einstein's theory of relativity in detail
  • Research the mathematical implications of timelike and spacelike dimensions
  • Study the effects of gravity on time, particularly in general relativity
  • Read Lee Smolin's essay on the nature of time for modern physics perspectives
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of time and its relationship with space.

cripkd
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Did Einstein meant by space-time continuous that time is just another dimension, like the other 3?
If so, why are we experiencing this one that differently? (Should this have gone in the phylosophy section?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thing I think of is we have no influence over our location in time. It's decided for us by nature. We can influence our locaiton in 3-space.
 
At least Einstein ment that the dimensions of space and the dimension of time where connected and not independent of each other. I find it hard to put them on equal footing, but it´s a good question...
 
Originally posted by cripkd
Did Einstein meant by space-time continuous that time is just another dimension, like the other 3?
If so, why are we experiencing this one that differently? (Should this have gone in the phylosophy section?)

Mathematically? Yes. Physically? No.
 
Ok, then what is time physically ? :)
I know this is an OLD question, and I'm asking it rethoricaly. Could someone point me to some resources on what time is, other than specutlations, at least what modern physics considers it to be , today :)
 
http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/whattime.html 's a nice essay from Lee Smolin (at the end, there is a little bio sketch of Smolin).

Just to add my own (short version of an) answer: we define time as that which is measured by clocks. It's flux depends on relative motion and gravity, and the process by which we accumulate information can only go in one direction with respect to that flux.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know how when you have a circle and you take a straight line perpendicular on the circle, in it's center, and sliding the circle along the line produces a cilinder?
Well this is how i see time, it generates the 4 - dimensional universe, with the 3 spatial dimension sliding in one direction along the line and perceve this movement as passing of time.
In my vision the universe, if looked upon from outside the 4 dimensional space-time continuous, would look motionless, every object having 'motion trails' that are in fact it's states in time.
 
Originally posted by cripkd
Did Einstein meant by space-time continuous that time is just another dimension, like the other 3?
If so, why are we experiencing this one that differently? (Should this have gone in the phylosophy section?)

You mean continuum? It is "just" another dimension, but a timelike dimension differs from a spacelike dimension in that for displacement along the timelike direction ds^2 has an overall sign difference from a dispacement along a spacelike direction. So they are indeed both mathematically and physically different types of dimension.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K