Elastic Collision 5: Acceleration at B & Magnitude Explained

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a ball undergoing elastic collisions with the floor. Participants are exploring the direction and magnitude of acceleration at specific points during the ball's motion, particularly at points A and B, while considering the implications of elastic collisions on velocity and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the direction of acceleration at point B, noting that it is directed upwards due to the change in vertical velocity during the collision. There are attempts to quantify the acceleration and its comparison to gravitational acceleration at point A. Questions arise regarding the assumptions of friction and the conservation of velocity components.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the nature of elastic collisions and the forces involved. Some guidance has been offered about the relationship between velocity changes and acceleration, while others question the assumptions made about friction and conservation principles.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about whether friction can be neglected in the scenario presented, as well as the interpretation of velocity conservation in different components of motion.

Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A ball bounces on the floor with elastic collisions like in the drawing.
The collisions take a short time in comparison to the travel between the collisions.
What is the direction of the acceleration at point B?
Why is the magnitude of the acceleration at point B bigger than at point A?

Homework Equations


In elastic collision with the floor the rebound velocity is the same as the approach velocity and energy is conserved.

The Attempt at a Solution


Because the ball travels to the right with identical loops the horizontal velocity is conserved so only the vertical component of the hit velocity changes direction, so the acceleration is directed upwards.
The ball has to acquire vertical velocity and just because it is said the time for the collisions is short i can assume the acceleration is higher than g, which is at point A, but i feel this explanation isn't good.
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
Karol said:

Homework Statement


A ball bounces on the floor with elastic collisions like in the drawing.
The collisions take a short time in comparison to the travel between the collisions.
What is the direction of the acceleration at point B?
Why is the magnitude of the acceleration at point B bigger than at point A?

Homework Equations


In elastic collision with the floor the rebound velocity is the same as the approach velocity and energy is conserved.

The Attempt at a Solution


Because the ball travels to the right with identical loops the horizontal velocity is conserved so only the vertical component of the hit velocity changes direction, so the acceleration is directed upwards.

It is on the opposite way: If friction can be ignored, the floor exerts only perpendicular ( vertical) force on the ball.

Karol said:
The ball has to acquire vertical velocity and just because it is said the time for the collisions is short i can assume the acceleration is higher than g, which is at point A, but i feel this explanation isn't good.

It is good... but you need to be a bit more accurate. The ball has a downward vertical component of velocity before hitting the floor, and it changes into vertically upward. So the vertical component of velocity changes from -vy to vy, and it happens in a very short time. The average acceleration is a=Δ vy/ Δt= 2vy/Δt. If Δt is very short it can be quite high value, much bigger than g.

ehild
 
Also you may want to note that velocity is not a conserved quantity. The i component of velocity remains constant, but it is not conserved.
 
It isn't written in the question that friction can be neglected.
What do you mean i component of velocity? for example the x component? and why isn't velocity preserved, if all i components, x y and z remain constant?
 
Karol said:
It isn't written in the question that friction can be neglected.

It was written in the problem that the collisions were elastic. There is no loss of KE in elastic collision. So friction can not take part.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K