Elastic Collision: Explaining the Energy Transfer in a Turtle-Lion Collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an elastic collision scenario involving a turtle and a lion, focusing on the transfer of kinetic energy during the collision. Participants explore the implications of mass and velocity in determining the kinetic energy of the two animals post-collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which the lion could have more kinetic energy after the collision, questioning the assumptions about mass and initial velocities. Some suggest that the turtle must be heavier and moving faster, while others challenge this reasoning by considering the implications of momentum and energy conservation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering varying perspectives on the nature of the collision and the relationship between mass, velocity, and kinetic energy. There is no clear consensus, as some participants emphasize the need for further reasoning and clarification of assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the collision occurs in a center of mass system and question the definitions of elastic versus inelastic collisions. There is also mention of the constraints regarding the initial velocities of the lion and turtle.

Dan350
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
What would you respond on this question?
Would you correct me if necessary on my response please?
Thanks

1. A turtle and a Lion have a violent collision on a frictionless horizontal field. As you witness the collision you realize that you are in the center of mas system. After the collision you note that the lion has more kinetic energy than the turtle.Explain how can this be possible and state what you have learned about the collision the lion an the turtle from the observation.




3. For me this is an elastic collision problem. For me, the only way the lion has more kinetic energy AFTER the collison is that the turtle was heavier than the lion an was moving faster. The Lion had to be not moving before the colliision.
What I learned about the observation was that not matter the size, what matters iswhats happening on the sceneario,, in this case the turtle moving faster
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The lion's p1 = m1 v1. The turtle's p2 = m2 v2. (v2 < 0).
The collision need not be elastic. Of course, it isn't totally inelastic either (some k.e. remains).

Juggle p1 and p2 around so that 1/2 m1 v1^2 > 1/2 m2 v2^2 even though m2 << m1.

(If you're at the c.m. then the lion cannot have initial velocity = 0. Remember, the c.m. does not change at any time.)
 
Dan350 said:
For me this is an elastic collision problem. For me, the only way the lion has more kinetic energy AFTER the collison is that the turtle was heavier than the lion an was moving faster.
As rude man says, it is not necessarily elastic. Pls post your reasoning for your conclusions.
 
So what's happening,, how can have more kinetic energy after the collision?
and, haru, what i was thinking was that the turtle had to hit the lion harder in orde to it to have more kinetic energy
 
Dan350 said:
So what's happening,, how can have more kinetic energy after the collision?
and, haru, what i was thinking was that the turtle had to hit the lion harder in orde to it to have more kinetic energy

You cannot have more k.e. after the collision than before.

You have to choose v1 and v2 such that the lion has more k.e. than the turtle after the collision. See my post #2.
 
Dan350 said:
what i was thinking was that the turtle had to hit the lion harder in orde to it to have more kinetic energy
Sure, but you cannot go from there to conclude that the turtle was both heavier and moving faster. It may only be one of the two. Could it be either, or does it have to be a particular one? Or is it the momentum or KE that has to be greater?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K