Elastic Collision Momentum problem help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic collision between two blocks with different masses, where one block is initially at rest. The original poster seeks to determine the maximum height to which the moving block rises after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of momentum and energy principles but becomes stuck in the calculations. They express confusion about the direction of motion post-collision.
  • Some participants suggest substituting variables to solve for the velocities after the collision and clarify the implications of negative velocity.
  • Others question the assumptions about the motion of the blocks after the collision and explore the reasoning behind the derived formulas for elastic collisions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to manipulate the equations for the velocities after the collision. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion regarding the direction of motion, and they appear to be gaining clarity on the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the implications of negative velocity in the context of the collision, indicating that the original poster's understanding of the scenario was initially misaligned with the physics of elastic collisions.

dynoma5
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m1 = 5.00 kg is released from A. It makes a head on elastic collision at B with a block of mass m2=10.0kg that is initially at rest. Calculate the maximum height to which m1 rises after the collision
a0f4d0e2c1e48a8eba9f9376d13c786d.jpg


Homework Equations



Pi = Pf
Ef= Ei + other work

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2 m1v1^2 = m1gh
v1 = square root of 2gh = 10 m/s
Pi = Pf
m1v1 +m2v2 = m1c1 + m2c2
m1v1 = m1c1 + m2c2
m1(v1 - c1) = m2c2
1/2 m1v1^2 = 1/2 m1c1^2 + 1/2 m2c2^2
m1(v1^2 - c1^2) = m2c2^2
then i used that and divided by the Pi = Pf and i got
(v1+c1) = c2
all right I'm stuck around here and have no clue what to do from here. Someone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have got two equations for c1 and c2.

m1(v1 - c1) = m2c2

and

(v1+c1) = c2

Insert the second one for c2 into the first equation, solve for c1, then calculate c2.

ehild
 
kk so then i'd get m1(v1 - c1) = m2(v1 +c1)
m1v1 - m2v1 = m2c1 + m1 c1
so c1= (m1v1 - m2v1)/(m2+m1)
but that would give me a negative which means that m1 would travel back after collision?
 
"but that would give me a negative which means that m1 would travel back after collision?"

yes, m1 starts to travel backwards and rises uphill, and you can calculate its maximum height now.

ehild

backwards and rises to the
 
omg i see it now. Even the question was implying that the m1 was going to go backward after collision but I was thinking that m1 was suppose to go forward too after the collision so I thought I did something wrong. kk so for c1 i got -3.33 m/s and c2 i got 6.67 m/s. using conservation of energy it will be Ef = Ei which is also PEf + KEf = KEi + PEi. m1gh = 1/2 m1c1^2. Reducing it down will be h = c1^2/2g = .55m ?I feel so stupid but thanks for the help. I've seen ppl use the formula 2m1v1/(m1+m2) + (m2-m1)/(m1+m2)v2 = c2 when solving for a elastic collision but how did they get that formula?
 
Last edited:
They use the same method you applied. In general,

m1v1+m2v2=m1c1+m2c2--->m1(v1-c1)=-m2(v2-c2)
m1v12+m2v22=m1c12+m2c22--->
m1(v1-c1)(v1+c1)=-m2(v2-c2)(v2+c2)

divide the equations :v1+c1=v2+c2.

You have two linear equations for c1 and c2:

v1+c1=v2+c2 (a)

m1(v1-c1)=-m2(v2-c2) (b)

Multiply eq. (a) by m1, and add to (b). c1 cancels. Solve for c2.

If multiplying (a) with m2 and subtracting (b), c2 will cancel.

About negative velocity after collision: push a light coin against a heavy one, what happens? Never tried?


ehild
 
ahh i see if you put it that way then i can see what you mean. Again thanks for the clarification!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K