Elastic Glancing Collision: Final Speeds and Scattering Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter kkuhnert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Elastic
Click For Summary
In the discussion on elastic glancing collisions, two masses (m and 3m) collide, with mass m moving left and mass 3m moving right at the same speed. After the collision, mass m moves downward at a right angle, prompting the need to find the final speeds of both masses and the scattering angle of mass 3m. The conservation of momentum equations are set up for both x and y directions, but complications arise due to the presence of multiple unknowns. It is suggested to use different variables for the speeds post-collision to clarify the equations. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of additional equations derived from the elastic nature of the collision to solve for the unknowns effectively.
kkuhnert
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two masses (m and 3m) are moving towards each other along the x-axis with the same initial speed (v). Mass m is traveling to the left while mass 3m is traveling to the right. They undergo elastic glancing collision such that mass m is moving downwards after the collision at right angles from its initial direction. a) Find the final speed of the two masses and b) The angle at which the 3m mass is scattered.

Homework Equations


Ei=Ef
E=(0.5)mv^2
pi=pf
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution


Pi=pf (x-direction)
3mv-mv = 3mv
2mv = 3mv
v=3mv/2m
v=mv
0=m

pi = pf (y-direction)
0=-mv+3m(1\3)v
mv=mv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pi=pf (x-direction)
3mv-mv = (3m)*Vx where Vx is the velocity of 3m in the x direction after collision
2mv = 3mv*Vx
Vx = (2/3)*v

pi = pf (y-direction)
0=-mv+3m(1\3)v
mv=mv
Oh, I made that mistake, too! But you can't use "v" for the downward speed of mass m after the collision as that letter is used for something else. Use another letter, perhaps "u". And Vy for the upward speed of 3m. Then you see that the equation can't be solved since you have two unknowns, u and Vy.

You can get another equation from the fact that the collision is elastic. That should be delightfully complicated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
977
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K