Elastic potential energy - different methods, different results

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of elastic potential energy and the discrepancies between two methods. The initial approach used the velocity equation, leading to a spring constant of 50,000 N/m, which was deemed incorrect. The correct method applied conservation of energy principles, yielding a spring constant of 100,000 N/m. The error was attributed to the assumption of constant acceleration and force in the first calculation. Ultimately, it was clarified that elastic potential energy is proportional to the square of the spring's elongation.
Iamconfused123
Messages
66
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
A car of mass 1000 kg hits the spring with a speed of 10 m/s and condenses it by 1 m. If we disregard the friction, what is the resistance constant of the spring?
Relevant Equations
##E_p=\frac{kx^{2}}{2}##, ##E_k=\frac{mv^2}{2}##
Can someone please tell me where I am wrong?
I tried to solve the problem using velocity equation; ##v_{f}^2= v_{i}^{2} + 2as## and got a= 50m/s^2, F= 50 000N and therefore F=kx -> k=50 000N/m because dx=1.

But it's not correct. When I do it using conservation of energy I get 100 000N/m. Which is correct according to the solutions.
##\frac{mv^2}{2}=\frac{kx^2}{2}## -> k=100 000N/m.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Iamconfused123 said:
Can someone please tell me where I am wrong?
Your first calculation is based on assumption of a constant acceleration / constant force. This assumption is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Iamconfused123
Hill said:
Your first calculation is based on assumption of a constant acceleration / constant force. This assumption is incorrect.
Thank you very much. Just figured, Ep is proportional to the square of the elongation of the spring.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
5K