Electric Field near current carrying wires

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two parallel infinitely long wires carrying steady currents I1 and I2, with a positive point charge moving between them. The objective is to determine the magnitude of an electric field necessary to maintain the charge's trajectory as it moves parallel to the currents.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the charged particle, including magnetic and electric forces, and question how to incorporate the electric field into the analysis. There are inquiries about the net force on the charged particle and the role of the magnetic field at the midpoint between the wires.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the forces involved, while others have raised concerns about the clarity of the problem statement and the interpretation of the question. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the currents, the magnetic field, and the required electric field without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the question appears to be a multiple-choice format, with options that suggest different relationships between the currents and the electric field. There is an emphasis on the need for a time-independent electric field due to the steady nature of the currents involved.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Two parallel infinitely long wires separated by a distance D carry steady currents I1 and I2 (I1>I2) flowing in the same direction. A positive point charge is moves between the wires parallel to the currents with a speed v at the distance D/2 from either wire. What is magnitude of an electric field that must be turned on to maintain the trajectory of the particle is proportional to?

Homework Equations


Magnetic attraction force per unit length [tex]f_m = {\mu_0 \over 4\pi} {I_1 I_2 \over D}[/tex]
If [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the linear charge density the electric force of repulsion per unit length is: [tex]f_e = \frac{1}{2\pi \epsilon_0}{\lambda \over D}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Without the charge moving the force between the wires will be attractive. The moving charge with exert a repulsive force. How do I bring the electric field in this picture? Use Gauss's law?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's a mistake in this problem. For starters, the last line of the question is hard to interpret exactly and besides that, the answer is the trivial result.

But in any case, you do not need to worry about the force between the wires. You are only asked to ensure that the moving charged particle keeps moving in a straight line. What is the net force on the charged particle due to the currents in the wires? How will you calculate this?
 
The force on the wires will be:
[tex]\vec F_1 = I_1\vec L \times \vec B[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_2 = I_2\vec L \times \vec B[/tex]
Since the charge is moving the force on the charged particle will be [tex]\vec F = q\vec v \times \vec B + q\vec E[/tex]
How are the forces balanced?
 
Last edited:
We care only about the force on the particle. The Lorentz force depends on the angle between the velocity of the charge and ...what? What is the magnitude of the B-field exactly midway between the wires?
 
Lorentz force depends on the angle between the velocity and magnetic field of the charged particle. The magnitude of the magnetic field at D/2 will be:
[tex]B = {{\mu_0 (I_1 + I_2)} \over {\pi D}}[/tex]
I have taken I1 + I2 due to the attractive nature of the magnetic force. Should I put this value for B in the Lorentz force equation? Also the magnitude of the magnetic force will be maximum since the particle is moving perpendicular to the field.
 
Last edited:
Reshma said:
Lorentz force depends on the angle between the velocity and magnetic field of the charged particle. The magnitude of the magnetic field at D/2 will be:
[tex]B = {{\mu_0 (I_1 + I_2)} \over {\pi D}}[/tex]
This is not correct.

Use the right-hand rule to figure out the direction of the magnetic field due to the current in each wire separately. What do you notice?
 
It is an old question...and it has not been solved propely.So,I am suggesting a method.May be that it is not a method that other people would appreciate.But this works well in exam hall.

[By the way, reshma missed something in the last part of the question, for which this looked rather diffcult.The question is an mcq and the options are:

(a) (I1-I2)v/D (b) (I1+I2)v/D (c) (I1-I2)v²/D² (d) (I1+I2)v²/D²

And Gokul43201 will find his answer.]

First start with dimensional analysis.(a) and (b) has the same dimension C/s² and (c) and (d) has the same dimension C/s³

Clearly (c) and (d) cannot be proportional to the electric field, the constant of proportionality being (1/(4pi*epsilon)) type.The constant of proportionaliy must be indeependent of time.Note that the question specifies STEADY current and we must deal with time independent electric field to satisfy the conditions imposed by the question.

Then we are left with (a) and (b).Since,I1 > I2,the magnetic force must be different on the charged particle and the particle should bend sideways.The electric field that CAN make the charge move along the straight line must be proportional to |I1-I2|,thus preventing the deflection of the charged particle due to non-uniform magnetic force.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
569
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K