Electric Field Zero on Gaussian Surface with No Charges

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tecnics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian Surfaces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Gauss's Law, which states that the surface integral of the electric field over a closed surface equals the charge enclosed by that surface. If no charge is enclosed, the integral is zero, meaning that while the electric field may not be zero everywhere, the net flux through the surface is zero. The conversation clarifies that the Gaussian surface does not need to be a physical conductor and emphasizes the importance of selecting Gaussian surfaces that match the symmetry of the charge distribution for practical calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically surface integrals
  • Knowledge of Gauss's Law and its mathematical formulation
  • Concept of charge distributions and their effects on electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of Gauss's Law in detail
  • Explore examples of Gaussian surfaces for different charge distributions
  • Learn about electric field calculations using symmetry principles
  • Investigate applications of Gauss's Law in electrostatics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the application of Gauss's Law in electric field calculations.

tecnics
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
why is the electric field zero , if the closed gaussian surface doesn't enclose any charges.
but,, if the charges are present at a distance outside the conductor??

and why isn't the electric field zero inside the gaussian surface, if there are charges distributed on the surface of the gaussian surface..

assume that our gaussian surface is an enclosed sphere...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your questions seem very confused, you mention a conductor...what conductor?

I'm going to venture a guess that you're confused by Gauss's law. Gauss's law says that the surface integral of the electric field over a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by this closed surface.

If there is no charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface (which doesn't have to be a physical surface like a conductor, but just any closed surface you want to draw) then the surface integral of the electric field is 0. It doesn't say that the electric field is 0, it says that the integral of the electric field over the Gaussian surface is 0. In the language of field lines, if there are no enclosed charges, then every field line that enters the Gaussian surface must exit it as well, so that the total integral is 0.
 
Matterwave said:
Your questions seem very confused, you mention a conductor...what conductor?

I'm going to venture a guess that you're confused by Gauss's law. Gauss's law says that the surface integral of the electric field over a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by this closed surface.

If there is no charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface (which doesn't have to be a physical surface like a conductor, but just any closed surface you want to draw) then the surface integral of the electric field is 0. It doesn't say that the electric field is 0, it says that the integral of the electric field over the Gaussian surface is 0. In the language of field lines, if there are no enclosed charges, then every field line that enters the Gaussian surface must exit it as well, so that the total integral is 0.

ok////
can u pls explain the Gauss law? i am definitely confused by it..
 
Sure.

Gauss's law states, quite simply, that the surface integral over a closed surface of the electric field in space (let's just treat the vacuum for now, we can modify it if you're in a medium) equals the enclosed charge inside the surface. In mathematical language the law is (using SI units):

$$\oint_S \vec{E}(x,y,z) \cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$$

Let's break this expression down. First you start off knowing that there is some electric field that permeates space (the electric field might turn out to be 0, if there are no charges anywhere). It is a vector field (it associates a vector with each point in space, even if that vector might be 0).

Then you pick ANY closed surface (the surface must be closed, so you can't pick a plane or something, but you can pick a sphere, or a box, or a cylinder) and you take the integral of the electric field over this surface. When you are taking this integral, this is a surface integral, so you have to first take the dot product of the electric field vector with the surface element vector (which is a vector that is normal to the surface itself). This dot product tells you by how much the electric field "pierces" your surface at that point. You add up all these contributions from all over your enclosed surface, and you will obtain a single number (with units of V*m). Gauss's law says that this number is the same as the number you get if you take the charge enclosed by the surface you drew and divide it by the permittivity of free space (an artifact of the SI system of units, but let's not worry about that right now).

Now, Gauss's law is completely general. You can pick any shaped surface you want (as long as it's closed) and any charge distribution you want and Gauss's law will still hold. However, unless your problem has some good symmetries involved (e.g. spherical symmetry, or cylindrical symmetry), it is very difficult, in practice, to actually perform that surface integral! You want to pick your Gaussian surfaces to match the symmetry of the given charge distribution. So if the charge is a point charge, choose a spherical Gaussian surface. If the charge is an infinite plane, then choose a pillbox.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
316
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K