Electric Fields inside Conductors & Gauss' Law

pandabear27
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am just starting to learn AP Physics C E&M, and I have some questions.

1. If I have a metal conductor sphere (neutral or charged), why is it that the electric field inside is always equal to 0?

2. Also, a question about Gauss's Law.
$$E \cdot A = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
Since ##Q_{enc}## only accounts for the charges INSIDE of the Gaussian surface, when we solve for E, then does that only account for the electric field that is created by the enclosed charges, or also charges that could be outside of the Gaussian surface?

I would really appreciate any help. Thank you!!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

2. all charges both inside and outside the surface contribute to ##\mathbf{E}##.
$$\int_S \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$$ is proportional to enclosed charges.
 
Last edited:
Got it, thank you!!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
pandabear27 said:
1. If I have a metal conductor sphere (neutral or charged), why is it that the electric field inside is always equal to 0?
In a conductor, charges can move. What will happen to them if there is an E field inside the conductor?
pandabear27 said:
2. Also, a question about Gauss's Law.
$$E \cdot A = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
Gauss' Law doesn't say that - it says $$\oint \vec E\cdot d\vec A=\frac{Q_{\mathrm{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$$The integral is important because Gauss is making a statement about the flux through a closed surface, not just some random non-closed surface.

Notice that a field line from a charge inside the surface will cross the surface once, and every field line from the charge will have the same sign for ##\vec E\cdot d\vec A## where it crosses. Thus the charge's contribution to the integral must be non-zero.

However, a field line originating outside the surface will cross twice, once inward and once outward, meaning it will make two opposite-signed contributions to the integral. They don't necessarily cancel exactly, but once you do the integral all these contributions do net to zero. So it's only charges inside the surface that matter for calculating the total flux.
 
1. I think if there's an E field inside the conductor, then the electrons would feel a force and start moving. Since electrons repel each other, they will go as far as possible, which is along the surface. How can this prove the ##E_{field} = 0##?

2. I see, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you so much!!!
 
pandabear27 said:
1. I think if there's an E field inside the conductor, then the electrons would feel a force and start moving. Since electrons repel each other, they will go as far as possible, which is along the surface. How can this prove the Efield=0?
It is not generally true that the E field in a conductor is 0. It is only true in the electrostatic limit where the current density is zero.
 
pandabear27 said:
1. I think if there's an E field inside the conductor, then the electrons would feel a force and start moving. Since electrons repel each other, they will go as far as possible, which is along the surface. How can this prove the ##E_{field} = 0##?
If they move when there's an E field, when will they stop moving? Might the changed arrangement of the electrons be able to provide that circumstance when added to your external field?

(Note that there might not be such a circumstance, as @Dale commented, but there will be for something like a conducting sphere near a charge.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K