Electric potential and kinetic energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum distance of approach between two point charges, Q and q, using the principles of electric potential and kinetic energy. Given Q=1.0 μC, q=1.0 nC, m=1.0 x 10^5 kg, and an initial speed v=3.0 x 10^5 m/s, the solution involves applying the conservation of energy formula. The final derived formula for the minimum distance, r2, is calculated using Coulomb's law and kinetic energy equations, leading to a result of approximately 2 x 10^-11 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and electric potential energy
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations and solve for variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Coulomb's law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Explore the concept of escape velocity in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the effects of varying charge and mass on electric potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism and energy conservation, as well as educators looking for practical examples of electric potential and kinetic energy interactions.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


A point charge Q is fixed in position, and a second object with charge q and mass m moves directly toward it from a great distance. If the initial speed of the object is v, compute the minimum distance between the two objects. If Q=1.0 μC, q=1.0 nC, m=1.0*105 kg, and v= 3.0*105m/s, what is the minimum distance of approach?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{r_2 }} + \frac{1}{2}v_f^2 ,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,v_f = 0 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{r_2 }} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> r_2 = \frac{{kQq}}{{\left( {\frac{{kQq}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 } \right)}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> r_2 = \frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}1.0\mu {\rm{C}} \cdot 1.0{\rm{nC}}}}{{\left( {\frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}1.0\mu {\rm{C}} \cdot 1.0{\rm{nC}}}}{{r_1 }} + \frac{1}{2}1.0 \times 10^{ - 5} \cdot 3.0 \times 10^5 } \right)}} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

This reminds me somewhat of gravity's escape velocity problem, where your final distance is irrelevant as long as it is large (theoretically infinity).

How do I dismiss r1, the initial starting position in this problem? Can I just get rid of the entire first term in the denominator, since when r1 is large, it approaches 0?

Thanks!

**edit, 3*105 should be (3*105)2. I get 2*10-11 meters for the answer. Did I do this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K