Electric Potential Energy Inside a Charged Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a point charge located just outside a uniformly positively charged non-conducting sphere. Participants are exploring the implications of electric potential energy and the nature of the forces acting on the charge as it moves towards the center of the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential for simple harmonic motion (SHM) and the application of Coulomb's force law and Gauss' law. There are questions regarding the nature of the electric field inside the sphere and the interpretation of potential energy values. Some participants express confusion about the implications of negative potential energy and the force acting on the charge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning assumptions about the nature of the forces and potential energy. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the charge's position and the energy required for it to move through the sphere. Some guidance has been offered regarding the reference point for potential energy, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the charge being able to pass through the sphere freely and the reference point chosen for potential energy, which affects the interpretation of energy values within the sphere.

Yoni V
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q<0 lies just outside a uniformly and positively (non-conducting) charged ball.
Assume the charge can pass through the ball freely. Describe the motion of the charge.

Homework Equations


Coulomb's force law, energy equation.

The Attempt at a Solution


Obviously this is simple harmonic motion and easily solved using coulomb's force law and Gauss' law, so I wouldn't even bother writing it down.
The only thing that puzzles me is the energy of the system. We get:
U(r)=kq[4/3πr3ρ]/r=kq4/3πρr2

Since q<0, the equation yields negative values inside the sphere and 0 for r=0.

This implies that the motion from the edge of the ball towards the center requires energy, which contradicts the obvious spontaneous motion of the point charge.

What am I misinterpreting?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yoni V said:
Assume the charge can pass through the ball freely. Describe the motion of the charge.
Obviously this is simple harmonic motion and easily solved using coulomb's force law and Gauss' law, so I wouldn't even bother writing it down.
Thanks
Are you sure it's SHM? What is the field inside the sphere?
 
Well, it is equivalent to the gravitational example of drilling a tunnel through the center of the earth. Both are inverse-square forces and can be proved that the effective force is only due to the inner portion of the ball.
Using Coulomb and Gauss laws we get:
F=k(4/3πr3ρ)(-q)/r2=-(4/3πρkq)r=mqa
Which gives SHM with ω2=4/3πρkq/mq

Am I mistaken?
 
Yoni V said:
Well, it is equivalent to the gravitational example of drilling a tunnel through the center of the earth. Both are inverse-square forces and can be proved that the effective force is only due to the inner portion of the ball.
Using Coulomb and Gauss laws we get:
F=k(4/3πr3ρ)(-q)/r2=-(4/3πρkq)r=mqa
Which gives SHM with ω2=4/3πρkq/mq

Am I mistaken?
Where does the charge q start?
 
At the outer edge of the ball (say at r=R)
 
Yoni V said:
At the outer edge of the ball (say at r=R)
It says 'outside'.
 
Anyway, to answer your original question, potential energy is always relative to an arbitrary reference value. You have chosen it to be zero at the sphere surface. That will make it negative inside. Not sure why you think that means it will require energy to penetrate the sphere. Just think that through again.
 
Oh, I meant just on the edge, such that it can "fall" freely into the ball.
English is not mother tongue, so sorry for being unclear.

Anyway, yes- the value itself is meaningless, but nonetheless given the above equation it increases as the value of r decreases.
Using the formula for the potential energy U=kq1q2/r (+ const.) and applying the superposition principle and Gauss' law we get
U(r)=(4/3)πρkqr2 (+ const=0).
Because q<0 and ρ>0 the energy is negative for all r>0 and zero for r=0, which means that the energy increases as I said above.

Surely my derivation of the potential energy is somehow incorrect, or perhaps it's my interpretation, but I don't understand what's wrong with it.

Thanks again
 
Yoni V said:
Because q<0 and ρ>0 the energy is negative for all r>0 and zero for r=0
Oh, I'm sorry - it's me that needed to read what you wrote again.
It's not just the energy that has the wrong sign, the force does too. It seems to stem from this:
Yoni V said:
F=k(4/3)πr3ρ(-q)/r2
Why have you inserted a minus sign on the q?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K