Electromagnetic damping logarithmic decrement task

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the damping logarithmic decrement (Λ) for a system consisting of a capacitor and a coil of copper wire. The parameters provided include the capacitance, dimensions of the wire, and the coil's length, but the calculation appears to yield a significantly different result than expected.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the "length of the coil," questioning whether it refers to the actual length of the wire or the length across the outside of the coil. There are inquiries about the number of turns and the cross-sectional area of the coil, indicating potential missing information.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup and the implications of the given parameters. Some guidance is offered regarding the use of equations to address perceived gaps in information, but no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation or approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the task is derived from a widely used textbook, suggesting that the problem may have specific assumptions or conventions that are not explicitly stated. There is also mention of the need to eliminate missing information through equations, which may affect the understanding of the problem.

wetback
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The contour consists of a condenser with capacitance C = 2.22*10^-9 F and a coil of copper wire. The diameter of the wire 5*10^-4 m, the length of the coil 20*10^-2 m. Determine the damping logarithmic decrement Λ of the fluctuations?

Given answer:0.018

Homework Equations



damping logarithmic decrement: Λ=2*Pi/sqrt((4L/CR^2)-1)
self-inductance of a coil: L=4*Pi*10^-7*(N^2/lc)*Sc (N number of turns, lc length of coil, Sc area of coil section)
resistance of the coil: R=(ρCu*lw)/(Pi*(d/2)^2) (ρCu=1.7*10^-8, lw-length of the wire,d-diameter of the wire)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer I got by combining the three equations: ~2.79*10^-12 . Probably wrong because differs a lot from the given so I'm asking for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the "length of the coil" the actual length of the wire used to make the inductor (i.e. if you unwrapped the whole thing), or is it the length measured across the outside of the coil? If it's the former, how many coils are there? If it's the latter, what is the cross-sectional area of the coil? Information is missing.
 
tman12321 said:
Is the "length of the coil" the actual length of the wire used to make the inductor (i.e. if you unwrapped the whole thing), or is it the length measured across the outside of the coil? If it's the former, how many coils are there? If it's the latter, what is the cross-sectional area of the coil? Information is missing.

Length of the coil is the length of the cylinder shape the coil makes. There is no information missing. You are supposed to use equations to eliminate the need for the missing information. The task is from a widely used book.
 
wetback said:
Length of the coil is the length of the cylinder shape the coil makes. There is no information missing. You are supposed to use equations to eliminate the need for the missing information. The task is from a widely used book.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something. You know the length of the coil. You know the diameter of the wire. So you know the number of turns. But you don't know the total length of the wire, so you can't figure out the circumference of a single loop or its cross-sectional area. It could be anything and still satisfy the length of the coil and the number of turns. I don't believe you supplied this information.
 
Not sure what is meant by "damping logarithmic decrement". The exponential term is R/2L, i.e. the envelope decays as exp(-Rt/2L).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K