Total moment density of electromagnetic fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the total electromagnetic momentum of an infinite solenoid with a stationary current and a uniform line charge along its axis. The discussion centers on the computation of both linear and angular momentum densities using the Poynting vector and the associated electromagnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of electric and magnetic fields, the calculation of the Poynting vector, and the subsequent momentum densities. There is an exploration of potential errors in the integration process and the treatment of unit vectors in cylindrical coordinates.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on each other's calculations, noting potential oversights and clarifying notational conventions. There is an acknowledgment of the need to consider the vector nature of the momentum density and angular momentum, leading to a deeper understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific examples from textbooks and discuss the implications of using cylindrical coordinates. There is also mention of the relationship between the variables used in the calculations and the physical setup of the problem.

987oscar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


These is a problem from my textbook. You have an infinite solenoid with n turns per unit longitude, radius "a" and a stationary current I. In the axis there exits a uniform line charge with lineal density λ. Compute total electromagnetic momentum (lineal and angular).

Homework Equations


Poynting vector: $$\mathbf{S}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{B}$$.
Momentum density: $$\mathbf{g}=\mu_0\epsilon_0\mathbf{S}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I computed electric and magnetic fields as usual.
Electric field :
$$\mathbf{E}=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0 r}\mathbf{\hat{r}}$$
Magnetic field (only exits inside solenoid):
$$\mathbf{B}=\mu_0 nI\mathbf{\hat{z}}$$
From here I find Poynting vector:
$$\mathbf{S}=\frac{-\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 r}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$
and momentum density:
$$\mathbf{g}=-\frac{\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\frac{1}{r}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$
From here I have angular momentum ##\mathbf{l}=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{g}##:
$$\mathbf{l}=-\frac{\lambda nI}{2\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\mathbf{\hat{z}}.$$
Integrating inside the solenoid for length 1 i find total angular momentum per unit longitude:
$$\mathbf{L}=\frac{-\lambda n Ia^2}{2\epsilon_0 c^2}\mathbf{\hat{z}}$$
When I try to compute total momentum per unit longitude I find:
$$\mathbf{G}=-\frac{\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\int_0^1dz\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_0^a\frac{1}{r}rdr\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}=\frac{-\lambda nIa}{\epsilon_0 c^2}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$.
Now the solution provided is ##\mathbf{G}=0## because momentum ##\mathbf{g}## forms closed lines ¿? Where is the mistake in my calculation?. I have been thinking about it but I can't find. Any idea? (##\mathbf{L}## calculation seems to be correct)

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
987oscar said:
$$\mathbf{S}=\frac{-\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 r}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$
and momentum density:
$$\mathbf{g}=-\frac{\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\frac{1}{r}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$
Looks like you forgot the factor ##\mu_0 \epsilon_0## in going from S to g.
From here I have angular momentum ##\mathbf{l}=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{g}##:
Here, I think you have notational confusion. Angular momentum is calculated relative to the origin. You can let ##\mathbf{R}## be the position vector of a point relative to the origin. So, angular momentum density would be ##\mathbf{l}=\mathbf{R}\times\mathbf{g}##. Be sure to distinguish between ##\mathbf{R}## and ##\mathbf{r}##. You can write ##\mathbf{R}## in terms of ##\mathbf{r}##, ##\hat{k}##, and ##z##.
When I try to compute total momentum per unit longitude I find:
$$\mathbf{G}=-\frac{\lambda n I}{2\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\int_0^1dz\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\int_0^a\frac{1}{r}rdr\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}=\frac{-\lambda nIa}{\epsilon_0 c^2}\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}$$.
In your integration, you treated ##\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}## as a constant unit vector. Think about why this is not correct.
 
Hello TSny!
Thank you for your comments.
I used ##\mu_0\epsilon_0=\frac{1}{c^2}## for the ##\mathbf{g}## vector.

I used cylindrical coordinates as we have an infinite solenoid. I think angular momentum is relative to Z axis and so ##\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{r}##. I followed example 8.4 in Griffiths Introduction to Electrodynamics 4º Ed. He calls "s" "horizontal" distance from a point to Z axis and he makes a product independent of s. I don't know if these is correct for this problem.

Of course! I can't treat ##\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}## as constant. I found ##\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}=-\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}## and for angular integral I now have:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}-\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}d\phi+\int_0^{2\pi}\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}d\phi=0$$
and ##\mathbf{G}=0##:smile::smile::smile:

Thank you very much for your help!
 
987oscar said:
I used ##\mu_0\epsilon_0=\frac{1}{c^2}## for the ##\mathbf{g}## vector.
OK. I overlooked the ##c^2##.:oops:

I used cylindrical coordinates as we have an infinite solenoid. I think angular momentum is relative to Z axis and so ##\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{r}##. I followed example 8.4 in Griffiths Introduction to Electrodynamics 4º Ed. He calls "s" "horizontal" distance from a point to Z axis and he makes a product independent of s. I don't know if these is correct for this problem.
Looks like maybe Griffiths is using ##s## for your ##r##. For example, you wrote the electric field in terms of ##r## which implies that you are using ##r## for the perpendicular distance from the axis. But, when calculating the angular momentum density ##\mathbf{l}##, you need to use the vector from the origin to the point where you are calculating ##\mathbf{l}##. So, you need a different symbol for this vector, say ##\mathbf{R}##. For a general point inside the solenoid, you should find that ##\mathbf{l}## has both an ##\hat{r}## component as well as a ##\hat{z}## component.
upload_2017-5-28_18-36-32.png


Of course! I can't treat ##\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}## as constant. I found ##\mathbf{\hat{\phi}}=-\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}## and for angular integral I now have:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}-\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}d\phi+\int_0^{2\pi}\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}d\phi=0$$
and ##\mathbf{G}=0##:smile::smile::smile:
Yes. Good!
 
OK. I think finally I've understood it with your drawing.

I make ##\mathbf{R}=\mathbf{r}+\mathbf{z}=r\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}+r\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}+z\mathbf{\hat{z}}##.

Making ##C=\frac{-\mu_0nI\lambda}{2\pi}##, I find ##\mathbf{g}=\frac{-C}{r}\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}+\frac{C}{r}\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}##. And now ##\mathbf{l}=\mathbf{R}\times\mathbf{g}=-\frac{Cz}{r}\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}-\frac{Cz}{r}\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}+C\mathbf{\hat{z}}##.

We compute total angular momentum per unit length
$$\mathbf{L}=\int_0^1dz\int_0^ardr\int_0^{2\pi}\left(-\frac{Cz}{r}\cos\phi\mathbf{\hat{x}}-\frac{Cz}{r}\sin\phi\mathbf{\hat{y}}+C\mathbf{\hat{z}}\right)d\phi.$$ But, ##\int_0^{2\pi}\cos\phi\, d\phi=0##, and ##\int_0^{2\pi}\sin\phi \,d\phi=0##.
Finally we get:
$$\mathbf{L}=C\pi a^2\mathbf{\hat{z}}=-\frac{\mu_0 nI\lambda a^2}{2}\mathbf{\hat{z}}.$$

Thanks a lot for your help!:smile::smile::smile:
 
Yes, that looks very good.

You can shorten the work a little by using symmetry. It should be clear that the total angular momentum ##\mathbf{L}## only has a ##z## component. So, you only need the ##z## component of the angular momentum density ##\mathbf{l}##, which is what you actually calculated in your first post. So, you got the correct total angular momentum in your first post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 987oscar
Thank you. You have helped me a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K