Electromagnetic Wave Theory - Jin Kong

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the book "Electromagnetic Wave Theory" by Jin Kong, particularly its suitability as a graduate-level textbook in electrical engineering. Participants explore its content, structure, and how it compares to other established texts in the field, such as Jackson and Balanis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the initial chapters of Kong's book are appropriate for undergraduate courses, while the later chapters are more advanced and suitable for graduate studies.
  • It is mentioned that the book covers a wide range of topics, including relativity, wave propagation, scattering, and radiation, but has a distinct engineering focus.
  • One participant finds Kong's book to be a more challenging read than Balanis and suggests it assumes a higher level of mathematical skill, including familiarity with complex variable methods.
  • There is a comparison made between Kong and Jackson, with one participant expressing a preference for Jackson's writing style despite Kong covering a broader range of topics.
  • Another participant expresses interest in books that provide unique discussions or additional topics not typically found in standard texts, indicating that Kong's book may meet this need.
  • Recommendations for other books in the IEEE Series on EM Wave Theory are provided, including Collin's "Field Theory of Guided Waves" and Elliot's antenna book, which are noted for their comprehensive coverage and first-principles approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of Kong's book compared to other texts, indicating that no consensus exists regarding its overall value or suitability as a primary textbook.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the book's engineering orientation and the assumption of advanced mathematical skills, which may limit its accessibility for certain readers. Additionally, the subjective nature of preferences regarding writing style and organization is noted.

cmos
Messages
366
Reaction score
1
Anybody have any experience with this book? It seems to be the standard in several graduate E&M courses in the EE dept. at MIT; custom published by them too. Is it just bound lecture notes or does it serve as a stand alone textbook? How does it compare to the "standards" such as Jackson and Balanis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am merely acquainted with the book, but since no one else is posting I'll tell you what I know of it.

The first chapter or two are actually suitable for undergraduate engineering courses on EM waves (includes transmission lines), but after that the book is surely at a graduate level. Coverage is pretty broad, including relativity, propagation and scattering of waves, and radiation (antennas, Cerenkov, ...). But the book definitely has an engineering bent. Some of the problems are pretty challenging, and answers to some of the problems are in the book as well.

Overall, it is a little harder read than Balanis, and assumes more mathematical skill as well. Kong uses complex variable methods, including asymptotic expansions, and the "Watson Transform" (useful for investigating creeping waves that get excited when a wave scatters from a cylinder). Balanis seems better organized to me, however, and goes through example in each coordinate system in a very methodical manner. Kong assumes you can do some fo that for yourself. Kong is roughly on par with Jackson, but during the little time I spent with Kong, I found that I liked Jackson's writing better (although Kong covers a better set of topics for me). I must say that the ugly font in Kong's book may have influence my opinion!

If you are looking for another graduate engineering EM book, Kong is a good book to check out. But I don't think I would recommend it if it will be you only such book.

jason
 
Thanks for the info, Jason. I'm basically interested in looking for books that either have additional topics not usually covered in the standard texts or give some sort of idiosyncratic, but useful, discussion on specific topics. To give you an idea of what I mean, I've been recently perusing through the titles in the IEEE Series on EM Wave Theory.

Anybody else have anything to say about Kong's book?
 
cmos said:
Thanks for the info, Jason. I'm basically interested in looking for books that either have additional topics not usually covered in the standard texts or give some sort of idiosyncratic, but useful, discussion on specific topics. To give you an idea of what I mean, I've been recently perusing through the titles in the IEEE Series on EM Wave Theory.
QUOTE]

Then Kong's book probably fits the bill for you.

In the IEEE series, I really like Collin's "field theory of guided waves" if you are interested in such topics. It is a giant book, but covers a lot of ground that I haven't seen in other textbooks and has a wonderful chapter on Green's functions - the only Green's function discussion that I like better is the one in Dudley's "mathematcal foundations for electromagnetic theory". Elliot's antenna book in the series is also really good, and more "first-principles" than some of the standards.

good luck,

jason
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
19K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K