Electron Energy Level Fall at a Given Wave Length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the initial energy level (n=?) of an electron in a hydrogen atom that falls to n=3, emitting a photon with a wavelength of 1100 nm. The energy of the emitted photon is calculated using the formula E = h * (c / λ), resulting in E = 18.07 x 10^-20 J. The change in energy is expressed as ΔE = -2.18 x 10^-18 * (1/n2^2 - 1/n1^2). After correcting the sign errors and recalculating, the initial energy level is determined to be n=6, indicating the electron transitioned from n=6 to n=3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom
  • Familiarity with the concepts of energy levels and photon emission
  • Knowledge of the Planck constant (h) and Rydberg constant (R)
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations involving exponents and fractions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom in detail
  • Learn about the Rydberg formula for hydrogen spectral lines
  • Explore the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and energy of photons
  • Practice solving problems involving energy transitions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and atomic structure, as well as anyone interested in understanding electron transitions in hydrogen atoms.

ptownbro
Messages
60
Reaction score
0


1. Homework Statement


An electron in the H atom falls from n=(?) to n=3. The wave length of the emitted photon is 1100 nm. From what level did the photon fall?

Homework Equations



Used the following to get the Energy.

w = c / v
E = h * v
E = h * (c/w)

w = lambda (couldn’t figure out how to use the real lambda symbol)
c = speed of light at 3*10^8 m/s (where “m” is meters and “s” is seconds)
v = frequency in Hz
E = Energy in Joules
h = planks constant at 6.62607*10^-34*J*s (where “J” is joules and “s” is seconds)

Then used the following along with the Energy calculated from above

Change in Energy = -2.18*10^-18 * (1/n2^2 – 1/n1^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Converted 1100nm to m.

=11*10^-7 mb) Calculated frequency using w = c / v

v = (3*10^8 m/s) / (11*10^-7 m)
v = (3*10^8 s^-1 * 10^7) / 11
v = (3*10^15 s^-1) / 11
v = 2.73*10^14 s^-1c) Calculated Energy using E = h * v (with v calculated in part b)

E = (6.62607*10^-34*J*s) * (2.73*10^14 s^-1)
E = (6.62607*10^-20*J) * (2.73)
E = 18.07*10^-20 J

d) Finally, calculated the level using the Energy

18.07*10^-20 J = (-2.18*10^-18) * (1/3^2 – 1/x^2)
(1/9 – 1/x^2) = (18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18)
(– 1/x^2) = (18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18) * 9
x^2 = - (-2.18*10^-18) / (18.07*10^-20 J * 9)
x = [(2.18*10^-18) / (-18.07*10^-20 J * 9)] ^ 1/2
...

Stopped because it didn’t seem right =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ptownbro said:
18.07*10^-20 J = (-2.18*10^-18) * (1/3^2 – 1/x^2)
(1/9 – 1/x^2) = (18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18)
(– 1/x^2) = (18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18) * 9
In the first line above, be careful with the sign. What energy should appear on the left-hand side: the energy of the photon or of the atom?

You have an error going from the second line to the third.
 
DrClaude said:
What energy should appear on the left-hand side: the energy of the photon or of the atom?

The energy of the photon.

While I fix my Algebra, can you tell me if we're on the right track and if our thinking is correct?
 
ptownbro said:
The energy of the photon.
Is that compatible with your equation?
ptownbro said:
Change in Energy = -2.18*10^-18 * (1/n2^2 – 1/n1^2)

ptownbro said:
While I fix my Algebra, can you tell me if we're on the right track and if our thinking is correct?
Apart from the sign problem I'm alluding to, yes.
 
I got the "Change in Energy" equation from the following youtube video:

I also understood and assumed that "Change in Energy" is the "amount of energy" released when the electrons change levels. So to me it made sense to make those equal to each other. So, re-written, it should read as:

-2.18*10^-18 * (1/n2^2 – 1/n1^2)

If my energy is

E = 18.07*10^-20 J

Then in my part d above I should be able to do:

18.07*10^-20 J = (-2.18*10^-18) * (1/3^2 – 1/x^2)

Where I try to solve for "x".

(Still working on correcting my math).
 
So I've reworked my math and here's where I'm at now. Again, the question is:

An electron in the H atom falls from n=(?) to n=3. The wave length of the emitted photon is 1100 nm. From what level did the photon fall?

From my original work above, I was able to get from 1100 nm to figure out the amount of energy that was released during the electron fall from n=(?) to n=3 as being equal to:

E = 18.07*10^-20 J

Then, using the following equation (given from the video referenced above (and partially confirmed from my daughter's notes) (By the way, I erroneously left out the "J" in the equations above. sorry!) :

E = -2.18*10^-18 J * (1/n2^2 – 1/n1^2)

Therefore, I should be able to solve for n1 (which I've replaced with "x") as follows:

18.07*10^-20 J = (-2.18*10^-18 J) * (1/(3^2) - 1/(x^2))
(18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18 J) = (1/(9) - 1/(x^2))
(0.1807*10^-18 J) / (-2.18*10^-18 J) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2) <--- here i just simply moved the decimal in the first pat to get both exponents to -18 so they can cancel
(0.1807) / (-2.18) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2)
-0.0829 = 0.1111 - 1/x^2
-0.0829 - 0.1111 = - 1/x^2
x^2 = -1 / -0.1940
x = 5.1546^(1/2)
x = 2.27

So... by my calculations the electron from the H atom fell from level n=2.27 to n=3.

Is that correct?

Seems weird that a level is not a whole number? Hmm...
 
I've looked at the video, and I think that it makes things very confusion for her to use the notation ##\Delta E_\mathrm{photon}##, as that is the change in energy of the atom, not the photon. She seems to be using the label photon because it is the "energy per photon" (which is also a strange thing to say).

So, let's try to do this from scratch. The energy of an orbit in the Bohr atom is ##E_n = -R / n^2##, where ##R## is the Rydberg constant expressed in units of energy. In SI units, you have ##R = -2.18 \times 10^{-18}\ \mathrm{J}##. Note that the Rydberg constant is often expressed in units of inverse length, because Rydberg originally used his formula to calculate the inverse wavelength ##1 / \lambda##.

For a transition from ##n_2## to ##n_1##, we get, for the atom,
$$
\Delta E = E_\mathrm{final} - E_\mathrm{initial} = \frac{-R}{n_2^2} - \frac{-R}{n_1^2} = -R \left( \frac{1}{n_2^2} - \frac{1}{n_1^2} \right)
$$
Going from a higher energy state to a lower energy state, you should have ##\Delta E < 0##.

Try again with the correct sign, and you should get a value of ##n## that is an integer (within rounding errors), and which is greater than 3, as the transition is from a higher excited state down to ##n=3##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
DrClaude said:
So you see that the sign is different from what you had, which I think is the source of the problem.

I'm sorry, but I don't see what you mean here? I don't see a difference in a sign as you indicated.
 
Sorry, I had made a mistake in post #7. I have now edited that post.

Instead of
ptownbro said:
(0.1807) / (-2.18) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2)
I get (-0.1807) / (-2.18) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2). The sign on the left-hand side is not the same, because since it is ##\Delta E## for the atom, it is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #10
Hm. Why would it be that way? It's falling from n=? to n=3.

I read that is n=? is the starting point (or n1) and n=3 is the final (or n2)

n=? is the initial and the start which is n1 in equation (or x in my expamle)
n=3 is the final which is n2 in equation

So if the formula is:

ΔE = R ( 1 / n2^2 - 1 / n2^2)

Then isn't it:
ΔE = R ( 1 / 3^2 - 1 / x^2)
ΔE = R ( 0.1111 - 1 / x^2)

Like I had it?
 
  • #11
ptownbro said:
Hm. Why would it be that way? It's falling from n=? to n=3.

I read that is n=? is the starting point (or n1) and n=3 is the final (or n2)

n=? is the initial and the start which is n1 in equation (or x in my expamle)
n=3 is the final which is n2 in equation

So if the formula is:

ΔE = R ( 1 / n2^2 - 1 / n2^2)

Then isn't it:
ΔE = R ( 1 / 3^2 - 1 / x^2)
ΔE = R ( 0.1111 - 1 / x^2)

Like I had it?
Sorry for the confusion I created. The original equation you had is correct:
ptownbro said:
Change in Energy = -2.18*10^-18 * (1/n2^2 – 1/n1^2)
But considering that the change in energy (##\Delta E##) is for the atom, then going from ##n_1 > n_2## down to ##n_2##, you have ##\Delta E < 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #12
Ok. Thanks. Just so I'm clear =D...

The answer is x = 2.27

Do you just round down to 2 and say that if went from n=2 to n=3?
 
  • #13
ptownbro said:
Ok. Thanks. Just so I'm clear =D...

The answer is x = 2.27

Do you just round down to 2 and say that if went from n=2 to n=3?
This answer is not correct. First, it is too far from a whole number. Second, it has to be greater than 3 (look at the problem statement: the atom is initially in a higher energy level). Look at post #9 for the equality with the correct signs.
 
  • #14
Ok. I saw your edits and let's see if I've got this straight now.

Starting from my result for energy where I found E = 18.07*10^-20 J. If I've understood you, if the level is going up, then I use the positive version of this number. If it's falling I have to make it a negative. Therefore, the start of my formula should be (-18.07*10^-20 J) instead of (+18.07*10^-20 J) as in below (the right side of the equation was okay as I had it originally):

(-18.07*10^-20 J) = (-2.18*10^-18 J) * (1/3^2) - 1/x^2)

The rest would flow as:

(-18.07*10^-20 J) / (-2.18*10^-18 J) = (.1111 - 1/x^2)
(-0.1807*10^-18 J) / (-2.18*10^-18 J) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2)
(-0.1807) / (-2.18) = (0.1111 - 1/x^2)
0.0829 = 0.1111 - 1/x^2
0.0829 - 0.1111 = - 1/x^2
x^2 = -1 / -.0282
x = 35.448^(1/2)
x = 5.95

rounded x = 6

So the level is going from n=6 to n=3.

How about now?
 
  • #15
Correct. You can always check by plugging back the values in the original equation: find ##\Delta E## when ##n_1 = 6## and ##n_2 = 3##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #16
Yes! Thank you for all your help and patience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K