Electron shells in atoms: WHY do they exist as they do?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PurposeNation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Electron
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence and characteristics of electron shells in atoms, focusing on why specific numbers of electrons occupy these shells, their arrangement relative to the nucleus, and the underlying reasons for electron behavior. Participants explore theoretical and conceptual aspects, touching on fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why only a certain number of electrons can occupy each shell and why shells are arranged at specific distances from the nucleus, expressing a desire for a deeper understanding of the causality behind these properties.
  • Another participant cites the Pauli exclusion principle as a key rule governing electron orbitals but notes that the fundamental reasons for such rules remain unknown, suggesting that asking "why" may not yield answers until new theories are developed.
  • A different participant elaborates that the Pauli exclusion principle arises from the nature of fermions and wavefunctions, indicating that some aspects of quantum mechanics are simply accepted as they are, which may feel unsatisfying.
  • One participant clarifies that electron shells refer to energy levels rather than physical shells and that the concept emerged with the development of quantum physics in the early 1900s.
  • Another participant explains that shells provide definite energies and that the probability of an electron collapsing into the nucleus is low, although it can occur in certain conditions, such as in heavier atoms.
  • One participant mentions the spin-statistics theorem, linking it to the behavior of fermions and the Pauli exclusion principle, but does not resolve the underlying "why" of electron behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the reasons behind electron behavior and the nature of electron shells. There is no consensus on the fundamental "why" questions, and multiple competing perspectives are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in understanding the foundational reasons for the rules governing electron behavior, indicating that some aspects are accepted without deeper explanation. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainty and exploration of complex quantum concepts.

PurposeNation
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have seen similar posts, but I haven't seen what seems to be a clear and direct answer.

Why do only a certain number of electrons occupy each shell? Why are the shells arranged in certain distances from the nucleus? Why don't electrons just collapse into the nucleus or fly away?

It seems there are lots of equations and theories that describe HOW electrons behave, predictions about WHERE they may be located, etc. But hard to find the WHY and causality behind these descriptive properties.

Thank you! Please be patient with me, new to this forum and just an amateur fan of physics.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer boils down to the fact that there are a few simple rules that govern how subatomic particles interact. One of the most important in regards to electron orbitals is the pauli exclusion principle. When it comes right down to it, we don't know why the fundamental rules of nature exist. We only know that they do, and asking "why" a fundamental rule exists is typically a pointless question, as there is no answer until another theory is developed (which then has its own fundamental rules that you could ask "why" about).
 
Drakkith said:
The answer boils down to the fact that there are a few simple rules that govern how subatomic particles interact. One of the most important in regards to electron orbitals is the pauli exclusion principle. When it comes right down to it, we don't know why the fundamental rules of nature exist. We only know that they do, and asking "why" a fundamental rule exists is typically a pointless question, as there is no answer until another theory is developed (which then has its own fundamental rules that you could ask "why" about).

Hi Drakkith. Thank you. Yes, have read about the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Understand it holds up well, but still very unsatisfying as to WHY electrons behave this way.

Hopefully I can continue to keep asking "pointless" questions on this forum if folks will be patient with me. =)

Thanks again.
 
Some things, like the pauli exclusion principle, arise from more fundamental rules. The PEP is due to the way the wavefunctions have to work for certain classes of particles called fermions. Other things, such as why a particle can be described by a wavefunction, just comes down to, "that's just the way it is". Unsatisfying maybe, but the truth.
 
Does atom has any shells?
How this theorie appeared?
 
vjacheslav said:
Does atom has any shells?
How this theorie appeared?

Shells refer to specific energy levels that electrons in atoms and molecules occupy. They are not physical shells.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_shell

The idea of shells came with the develop of quantum physics in the early 1900's.
 
Also I wrote this somewhere else too...
The shells don't give you a certain radius around the nucleus. They give you definite energies.
The QM treatment of the atom, gives you the probability of finding an electron within some radius range. The definite radii appear only as the classically behaving mean values of the radius.
The probability of an electron collapsing in a nucleus is rather small (it can happen and is called electron capture) but it generally happens to heavier atoms (proton-rich nuclides). The electron can as well fly away (ionization) if it gets enough energy to leave its bound state.
What do you mean "why" and "casuality"? Everything works fine with casuality in QFT... The Schrödinger equation doesn't have to be casual, because it's not a relativistic equation (is not Lorentz covariant). The why itself is unanswered because it makes no sense (at least to me as you ask it)- it's how nature works and how the eigenvalue-eigenstate equations work.
 
Certainly, but each time such exact seems strange.
By the way, bit chemie:
how to obtain 2g Fe2+?
 
I'm sorry, I can't understand your post very well.
 
  • #10
PurposeNation said:
\but still very unsatisfying as to WHY electrons behave this way.

Its related to a deep theorem of Quantum Field Theory called the spin statistics theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-statistics_theorem
'Spin statistics theorem implies that half-integer spin particles are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle, while integer-spin particles are not. Only one fermion can occupy a given quantum state at any time, while the number of bosons that can occupy a quantum state is not restricted. The basic building blocks of matter such as protons, neutrons, and electrons are fermions. Particles such as the photon, which mediate forces between matter particles, are bosons.'

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K